Light-emitting fusion proteins and diagnostic and therapeutic methods therefor

ABSTRACT

Light-generating fusion proteins having a ligand binding site and a light-generating polypeptide moiety and their use as diagnostics, in drug screening and discovery, and as therapeutics, are disclosed. The light-generating fusion protein has a feature where the bioluminescence of the polypeptide moiety changes upon binding of a ligand at the ligand binding site. The ligand may be, for example, an enzyme present in an environment only under certain conditions, e.g., ubiquitin ligase in a hypoxic state, such that the light-generating fusion protein is “turned on” only under such conditions.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Application No. 60/277,425, filed Mar. 20, 2001; No. 60/277,431, filed Mar. 20, 2001; No. 60/277,440, filed Mar. 20, 2001; No. 60/332,493, filed Nov. 9, 2001; No. 60/332,334, filed Nov. 9, 2001; No. 60/345,200, filed Nov. 9, 2001; No. 60/345,131, filed Dec. 20, 2001, No. 60/342,598, filed Dec. 20, 2001; and No. 60/345,132, filed Dec. 20, 2001 each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

STATEMENT AS TO FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

This invention was made with U.S. government support under the National Institutes of Health grant CA68490. The government has certain rights in the invention.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to compounds which are useful for detecting localization of an entity in vivo. The invention features the use of light emitting proteins as diagnostic tools for imaging, diagnosis, drug screening and discovery, and as pharmaceuticals for in vivo treatment.

A key advance in the biomedical arts has been the discovery of bioluminescent protein moieties, e.g., green fluorescent protein (GFP) and luciferase, which can be expressed in diverse mammalian cell types and thus act as detectable signals for biological signal transduction pathways and events. An increased understanding of how diverse biological processes are regulated by the actions of cellular enzymes, e.g., kinases, proteases, and ubiquitin ligases, has also been emerging. Alterations in the activity of these enzymes may underlie the initiation and/or progression of diseases such as cancer.

Methods of detecting biological activities and substances using bioluminescent proteins have recently been developed. For example, protein phosphorylation events can be detected using fusion proteins containing GFP (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,958,713) or luciferase, aequorin and obelin (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,683,888). Light-generating moieties have been introduced into mammals to specifically localize events such as parasite infection (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,650,135).

How cells sense changes in ambient oxygen is a central problem in biology. In mammalian cells, lack of oxygen, or hypoxia, leads to the stabilization of a sequence-specific DNA-binding transcription factor called HIF (hypoxia-inducible factor), which transcriptionally activates a variety of genes linked to processes such as angiogenesis and glucose metabolism.

Tissue ischemia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Ischemia can result from chronic hypoxia brought on by lack of blood supply to the tissue occurring from, for example, stroke, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, and renal failure. Ischemic tissue is also found in tumors.

HIF binds to DNA as a heterodimer consisting of an alpha subunit and a beta subunit (also called aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator or ARNT). The alpha subunit is rapidly polyubiquitinated and degraded in the presence of oxygen whereas the beta subunit is constitutively stable. von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is a hereditary cancer syndrome characterized by the development of highly vascular tumors that overproduce hypoxia-inducible mRNAs such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The product of the VHL tumor suppressor gene, pVHL, is a component of multiprotein complex that contains elongin B, elongin C, Cul2, and Rbx1. This complex bears structural and functional similarity to SCF (Skp1/Cdc53 or Cullin/F-box) ubiquitin ligases. In the presence of oxygen pVHL binds directly to HIFα subunits and targets them for polyubiquitination and destruction. Cells lacking functional pVHL can not degrade HIF and thus overproduce mRNAs encoded by HIF-target genes.

Progress has also been made in recent years towards understanding the molecular mechanisms in control of cell proliferation. Aberrant cell proliferation is a hallmark event in the onset and progression of diseases such as cancer. Progression through the mammalian cell-cycle is linked to the orchestrated appearance and destruction of cyclins. Different cyclins are associated with different cell-cycle transitions. For example, cyclin E is active in late G1 and early S-phase, cyclin A is active in S-phase, and cyclin B is active in mitosis. Cyclins bind to cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks). In this context, cyclins activate the catalytic activity of their partner cdk(s) and also play roles in substrate recognition.

Some transcriptional regulatory proteins, such as the pRB homologs p107 and p130, the E2F family members E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3, the transcriptional coactivator p300, and NPAT (nuclear protein mapped to the AT locus) form stable complexes with cyclin A/cdk2 and/or cyclin E/cdk2. All of these proteins bind directly or indirectly to DNA. Thus, such complexes might serve as vehicles for increasing the concentration of cyclin A/cdk2 or cyclin E/cdk2 at certain sites within the genome. As such, cyclin A/cdk2 and cyclin E/cdk2 might play relatively direct roles in processes such as transcription and DNA replication. These two processes are fundamental in normal cell proliferation and are perturbed during aberrant cell proliferation, such as in cancer.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates in part to the discovery of light-generating fusion proteins (or a cell expressing the light-generating fusion protein), wherein the light-generating fusion protein features a ligand binding site and a light-generating polypeptide moiety. The light-generating fusion protein (“LGP”) has a feature where the light generation of the light-generating polypeptide moiety changes upon binding of a ligand at the ligand binding site. The ligand may be active in an environment only under certain conditions, e.g., in a hypoxic state, such that the light-generating fusion protein is “turned” on or off only under such conditions.

In one embodiment, the invention relates to non-invasive methods for detecting the localization of an entity in a subject, wherein a light-generating fusion protein having a ligand binding site and a light-generating polypeptide moiety, or a cell expressing same is administered in vivo. The light-generating fusion protein and/or cell expressing the light-generating fusion protein, upon localization, may be imaged by means of detection of the presence (or absence) of luminescence in the subject, thereby localizing the entity.

The entity may be a variety of things; entities for which the invention has particular utility include tumors, proliferating cells, pathogens, and cellular environments including hypoxic tissue.

The light-generating fusion proteins of the invention may be used in a variety of ways, such as for screening for modulators of activity or latency of (or predisposition to) disorders such as hypoxia, cancer, diabetes, heart disease or stroke. For example, a test compound may be administered to a test animal at increased risk for such a disorder, wherein the test animal recombinantly expresses a light-generating fusion protein, allowing for localization of the light-generating fusion protein, detecting the luminescence of the light-generating polypeptide moiety in the test animal after administering the test compound, and comparing the luminescence of the light-generating polypeptide moiety in the test animal with the luminescence of the light-generating polypeptide moiety in a control animal not administered the test compound. A change in the activity of the light-generating polypeptide moiety in the test animal relative to the control animal indicates the test compound may be a modulator.

Methods of imaging hypoxic tissue in subjects, e.g., mammalian subjects, include administering to a subject a light-generating fusion protein comprising an ubiquitin ligase binding site and a light-generating polypeptide moiety or a cell expressing the light-generating fusion protein, allowing for localization of the light-generating fusion protein or cell in hypoxic tissue in the subject; and measuring the luminescence of the localized light-generating fusion protein and imaging the localized light-generating fusion protein so as to image the hypoxic tissue. In an alternate embodiment, the effects of an anti-hypoxic compound in vivo may be determined, where the light-generating fusion protein features a ubiquitin ligase binding site.

Methods in accordance with the invention are also provided for non-invasively detecting cancerous tissue in a subject. In such methods, a light-generating fusion protein including a cyclin/cdk binding site and a light-generating polypeptide moiety (or a cell expressing the light-generating fusion protein) is administered to a subject, the light-generating fusion protein or cell is allowed to localize, and luminescence from the localized light-generating fusion protein is detected, measured and/or imaged, thereby detecting cancerous tissue. In a related embodiment, the effects of an anti-cell proliferation compound under study in a mammalian subject may be determined by administering to a test subject a light-generating fusion protein containing a cyclin/cdk binding site or a cell expressing the light-generating fusion protein of the invention, allowing for localization of the fusion protein or cell, measuring luminescence from the localized light-generating fusion protein; and imaging the localized light-generating fusion protein, thereby determining the effects of the anti-cell proliferation compound.

Cyclin/cdk activity may be assayed in another embodiment of the invention wherein a test sample is contacted with a light-generating fusion protein comprising a cyclin/cdk binding site and a light-generating polypeptide moiety; and thereafter the presence or amount of cyclin/cdk activity in said test sample is determined by measuring the luminescence of the test sample.

The invention yet further relates to DNA constructs, including an isolated DNA encoding a modified LGP wherein one or more amino acids have been substituted, inserted or deleted to provide a ligand binding site such as a ubiquitin ligase or protease recognition site, wherein fluorescence of the LGP changes upon binding of a ligand to the ligand binding site.

The invention also relates to light-generating fusion proteins having a ligand binding site, such as a ubiquitin ligase binding site, or a HIF1α polypeptide moiety; and a light-generating polypeptide moiety. Another embodiment features a light-generating fusion protein with a cyclin/cdk binding site, a suicide protein polypeptide moiety, and a light-generating polypeptide moiety; and a light-generating fusion protein comprising a protein dimerization domain and a light-generating polypeptide moiety. In a preferred embodiment, the light-generating fusion proteins have the property that upon ligand binding to the ligand binding site, the luminescence of the light-generating polypeptide moiety is changed without altering the phosphorylational state of the fusion protein.

The invention further relates to fusion proteins including a HIF1α polypeptide moiety or cyclin/cdk binding site, and a suicide protein polypeptide moiety. A light-generating polypeptide moiety may optionally be included. These protein constructs may be used to selectively target certain cells, e.g., hypoxic tumor cells, for destruction. Other embodiments of the invention include a cyclin/cdk binding site and a light-generating polypeptide moiety; and a protease binding site and a light-generating polypeptide moiety. Antibodies specific for a protein complex comprising HIF1α and pVHL are also detailed as within the present invention.

The invention also outlines an approach for monitoring enzyme activity by producing the enzyme of interest fused to a heterologous DNA binding domain along with a reporter plasmid containing DNA binding domain binding sites upstream of a reporter gene, such as luciferase or GFP, capable of being measured non-invasively.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of different fusion proteins of the present invention. FIG. 1A is a schematic representation of different fusion proteins of the present invention. “T” indicates the enzyme target site on the fusion protein, “E” indicates the enzyme, “X” indicates the modification site on the fusion protein, and “R” indicates the reporter domain of the fusion protein. The modification at “X” by “E” results in the fusion protein becoming active or inactive “On/Off”. FIG. 1B shows an embodiment wherein the “T” and the “X” are separate domains and are in cis on the fusion protein. FIG. 1C shows an embodiment of the invention wherein the “T” and the “X” of the fusion protein are congruent within a domain of the fusion protein. FIG. 1D shows an embodiment of the invention wherein the “T” is on a protein associated with the fusion protein containing the “X”.

FIG. 2 is a second schematic representation of different fusion proteins of the invention. FIG. 2A is a schematic representation of a fusion protein and associated protein of the present invention in which a fusion protein and an associated protein “A” contains a known homo- or hetero-dimerization domain “HD” corresponding to the enzyme target site of an enzyme, where binding of the enzyme-associated “A” to the HD on the fusion protein results in modification of the fusion protein at “X”. FIG. 2B is a related aspect of the invention in which a binding domain of a protein “A” containing an enzyme target site “T” interacts with a binding domain “B” of a fusion protein, which results in enzyme “E” modifying the reporter domain “R” of fusion protein “B” at modification site “X” such that the fusion protein does or does not emit light or cause light to be emitted.

FIG. 3 shows pVHL binding to a modified form of HIF. (A) shows pVHL-defective renal carcinoma cells treated with increasing amounts of desferoxamine (2, 10, 100, 1000 μm) or cobalt choloride (2, 10, 100, 1000 μm) and immunoprecipitated with control (lane 1) or anti-HIF2α antibody. Bound proteins were detected by anti-HIF2α immunoblot (IB) or by farwestern (FW) analysis with purified pVHL/elongin B/elongin C (VBC) complexes. (B) shows VBC farwestern and anti-HIF2α immunoblot analysis of ts20 cells grown at the restrictive temperature under hypoxic or normoxic conditions. (C and D) depict GST-HIF1α(530-652), containing the oxygendependent degradation domain (ODD), produced in E. Coli, recovered on glutathione Sepharose, and incubated with rabbit reticulocyte lysate for 90 min at 30° C. In (D, lane 3), the reticulocyte lysate was first heat inactivated for 20 min. Following stringent washes the GST-ODD protein was subjected to VBC farwestern and anti-GST immunoblot analysis.

FIG. 4 shows pVHL binding to a HIF1α-derived peptide if Leu562 and Pro564 are intact. (A) shows binding of the indicated ³⁵S-labeled Gal4-HIF1α fusion proteins to immobilized GST-pVHL, elongin B, elongin C complexes. (B) shows binding of ³⁵S-labeled pVHL to biotinylated HIF1α(556-575) peptides with the indicated substitutions of residues 561-568. ‘+’ indicates preincubation of peptide with unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate prior to addition of pVHL. (C and D) depict ³⁵S-labeled wild-type (WT), Pro564Ala, and Leu562Ala full-length HA-HIF1α (panel C) and Gal4-HA-HIF1α(530-652) (panel D) proteins immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody or captured with immobilized GST-VBC complexes. WG=wheat germ extract; Retic=rabbit reticulocyte lysate.

FIG. 5 shows ubiquitination and degradation to a HIF linked to Leu562 and Pro564. (A) depicts in vitro ubiquitination of ³⁵S-labeled wild-type, Leu562A, and Pro564A Gal4-HA-HIF1α(530-652) in the presence of S100 extracts prepared from pVHL-defective renal carcinoma cells stably transfected to produce wild-type pVHL or with empty vector. (B) shows in vitro degradation of ³⁵S-labeled wild-type, Leu562Ala, and Pro564Ala in xenopus egg extracts. (C) is an anti-HA immunoblot analysis of COS7 cells transiently transfected with 1.5 or 3.5 pg of plasmids encoding wild-type or P564A HA-HIF1α in the absence or presence of desferoxamine.

FIG. 6 depicts proline hydroxylation linked to pVHL-binding. (A) is a MALDI-TOF analysis of wild-type, Pro564Ala, and Leu562Ala biotinylated HIF(556-575) peptides following incubation with rabbit reticulocyte lysate. (B) shows Gal4-HA-HIF (555-575) translated in vitro in the presence of 3H-Proline with rabbit reticulocyte lysate or wheat germ extract and gel-band purified. Following acid hydrolysis proline and hydroxyproline were separated using thin layer chromatography. The dashed circle indicates positions of ninhydrin stained proline and hydroxyproline markers.

FIG. 7 illustrates pVHL specifically recognizing HIF1α with hydroxylated proline 564. (A and B) shows binding of ³⁵S-labeled pVHL to biotinylated HIF1α(556-575) peptides with the indicated substitutions of residues 561-568. (C) shows ts20 cells stably transfected to produce HA-pVHL grown at restrictive (lane 1) or permissive (lanes 2-6) temperature and immunoprecipitated anti-HIF1α (lane 1 and 2) or anti-HA antibody (lanes 3-7). Bound proteins were eluted by boiling in sample buffer (lane 1 and 2) or treatment with the indicated peptides and then immunoblotted with anti-HIF1α antibody. (D) shows pVHL-defective renal carcinoma cells stably transfected to produce wild-type pVHL (WT8) or with empty vector (RC3) metabolically labeled with ³⁵S methionine, lysed, and incubated with immobilized biotinylated HIF1α(556-575) peptides with the indicated substitutions of residue 564. Specifically bound proteins were detected by autoradiography.

FIG. 8 illustrates the production of TETr-cyclins A and E. (A) is a schematic of TETr-cyclin fusion protein. (B) shows production of TETr-cyclin A and TETr-cyclin E. Cells transfected to produce the indicated cyclin A or cyclin E proteins were lysed and immunoblotted (IB) with the indicated antibodies. (C) shows phosphorylation of pRB by TETr-cyclins A and E in SAOS-2 cells. pRB-defective SAOS-2 cells transfected so as to produce HA-tagged pRB along with the indicated cyclins were lysed and immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody. The % of transfected cells in G1 and S phase was determined by fluororescence activated cell sorting (FACS).

FIG. 9 shows DNA bound cylins A and E differentially affecting transcription. (A) is a schematic of reporter plasmid (pUHC 13-3) that contains seven TETracycline operator sequences (TETo) upstream of a minimal CMV promoter that includes a TATA box. (B, C) show U20S cells were cotransfected with plasmids encoding the indicated TETr fusion proteins along with the pUHC 13-3 reporter plasmid and a plasmid encoding β-galactosidase. Numbers shown at the bottom of the graph indicate the amount of TETr plasmid (in μg). 48 hours later luciferase activity, normalized for β-galactosidase, was determined. Fold repression is the corrected luciferase value for TETr alone divided by the corrected luciferase values for the indicated TETr fusion proteins. Fold activation represents the corrected luciferase values for the indicated TETr fusion proteins divided by the corrected luciferase value for TETr alone.

FIG. 10 illustrates transcriptional regulation by cyclins A and E dependent upon DNA binding. (A) shows U20S cells cotransfected with plasmids encoding the indicated TETr fusion proteins along with the pUHC 13-3 reporter plasmid and a plasmid encoding β-galactosidase. 24 hours later doxycycline was added to a final concentration of 2 μg/ml where indicated by a ‘+’. 24 hours later, luciferase activity, corrected for β-galactosidase activity, was determined and expressed as fold repression or activation relative to cells producing TETr alone. (B) shows U20S cells cotransfected with plasmids encoding the indicated cyclins along with the pUHC 13-3 reporter plasmid and a plasmid encoding β-galactosidase. Fold repression and activation was determined as in (A). (C) shows U20S cells cotransfected with plasmids encoding TETr or TETr-cyclin E, along with a minimal HSV-TK promoter reporter plasmid containing the indicated number of TETo binding sites and a plasmid encoding β-galactosidase. Doxycycline was added as in (A).

FIG. 11 depicts that cyclin box is required for transcriptional repression by DNA bound cyclin A. (A) U20S cells were cotransfected with plasmids encoding the indicated TETr-cyclin A variants along with the pUHC 13-3 reporter plasmid and a plasmid encoding β-galactosidase. Cell extracts were prepared and luciferase activity, corrected for β-galactosidase activity, was expressed as fold repression relative to cells producing TETr alone. (B) The indicated TETr-cyclin A variants were translated in vitro in the presence of ³⁵S-methionine and incubated with GST-cdk2 and glutathione Sepharose. Specifically bound proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and detected by autoradiography. In parallel, 20% of the input proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and detected by autoradiography. (c) pRB defective SAOS-2 cells transfected so as to produce HA-tagged pRB along with the indicated TETr-cyclin A variants were lysed and immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody.

FIG. 12 illustrates that transcriptional activation by cyclin E is linked to its ability to bind to cdk2 and interact with substrates. (A) U20S cells were cotransfected with plasmids encoding the indicated TETr-cyclin E variants along with the pUHC 13-3 reporter plasmid and a plasmid encoding β-galactosidase. Cell extracts were prepared, and luciferase activity, corrected for β-galactosidase activity, was expressed as fold activation relative to cells producing TETr alone. (B) The indicated TETr-cyclin E variants were translated in vitro in the presence of ³⁵S-methionine and incubated with GST-cdk2 and glutathione Sepharose. Specifically bound proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and detected by autoradiography. In parallel, 20% of the input proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and detected by autoradiography. (c) pRB defective SAOS-2 cells transfected so as to produce HA-tagged pRB along with the indicated TETr-cyclin E variants were lysed and immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody.

FIG. 13 shows that transcriptional activation by DNA bound cyclin E depends on cdk2 catalytic activity. (A, B) U20S cells were transiently cotransfected with plasmids encoding TETr-cyclin A or E and, where indicated, increasing amounts of a plasmid encoding a dominant-negative (dn) form of cdk2. Cell extracts were prepared and luciferase activity, corrected for β-galactosidase activity, was determined. Corrected luciferase values were expressed as fold repression (A) or activation (B) relative to TETr alone. (C) U20S cells were transiently transfected with plasmids encoding TETr-cdk2 or TETr-cdk2 (N132A) and a plasmid encoding either cyclin A or E. Cell extracts were prepared and luciferase activity, corrected for β-galactosidase activity, was determined. Corrected luciferase values were expressed as fold activation relative to TETr alone.

FIG. 14 shows transcriptional effects mediated by cell-cycle dependent changes in endogenous cyclins E and A. (A,B) 3T3 cells stably transfected with a luciferase reporter plasmid containing 7 TETo sites (pUHC13-3) and a plasmid encoding TETr-cdk2 were serum-starved for 72 hours and subsequently re-fed with serum. At various timepoints thereafter aliquots of cells were removed and either lysed for immunoblot analysis with the indicated antibodies or analyzed for DNA content by propidium iodide staining followed by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). (C) 3T3 cells stably transfected with a luciferase reporter plasmid containing 7 TETo sites (pUHC13-3) in the absence (open circles) or presence of a plasmid encoding TETr-cdk2 (closed squares) or TETr-cdk2 (N132A) (open squares) were serum-starved for 72 hours and then re-fed with serum in the presence or absence of doxycycline. At various timepoints thereafter luciferase assays were performed. To correct for general effects due to serum, the luciferase values at each timepoint in the absence of doxycycline were corrected by subtracting the luciferase assay obtained in the presence of doxycycline. After correction, the luciferase values for the two cell populations were expressed relative to the corresponding luciferase values obtained at time 0. In parallel, the cells producing TETr-cdk2 were lysed and immunoprecipitated with anti-cyclin A or anti-cyclin E antibodies. The immunoprecipitates were then used to phosphorylate Histone H1 in vitro.

FIGS. 15-18 illustrate the results obtained in Example 2.

FIG. 19 illustrates the wild type sequence of HIF1α, Accession No. Q16665 (SEQ ID NO: 9).

FIG. 20 illustrates kinase Cdk2, when bound to either cyclin E or cyclin A, can direct the phosphorylation of its substrates.

FIG. 21 illustrates the use of a particular light-generating fusion protein of the invention (Example 4), containing a cyclin binding site (‘T’) that interacts with cyclin/cdk2 complexes.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Definitions

“Light-generating” or “luminescent” includes the property of generating light through a chemical reaction or through the absorption of radiation, including phosphorescence, fluorescence, and bioluminescence.

“Light” includes electromagnetic radiation having a wavelength of between about 300 nm and about 1100 nm, but can be of longer or shorter wavelength.

“Non-invasive” methods for detecting localization in a subject does not include largely invasive methods such as conventional surgery or biopsy.

“Light-generating fusion protein” includes proteins of the invention having a light-generating or luminescent portion, i.e., a light-generating polypeptide moiety and a ligand binding site. In general, when a ligand of interest binds to the ligand binding site of the light-generating fusion protein, the light-generating properties of the light-generating polypeptide moiety change, either going from “dark” to “light”, or vice versa.

“Light-generating polypeptide moiety” includes any protein known to those of ordinary skill in the art to provide a readily detectable source of light when present in stable form. Non-limiting examples include light-generating proteins described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,683,888, 5,958,713, and 5,650,135, e.g., ferredoxin IV, green fluorescent protein, red fluorescent protein, yellow fluorescent protein, blue fluorescent protein, the luciferase family and the aequorin family. In a preferred embodiment, the light-generating polypeptide moiety is a protein such as green fluorescent protein, red fluorescent protein, yellow fluorescent protein and blue fluorescent protein.

“Colinear effector site” includes regions of the light-generating polypeptide moiety that, when acted on by events subsequent to ligand binding, cause the light-generating polypeptide moiety to change its present light-emitting state (i.e., on or off). These regions making up the colinear effector site may do this by, e.g., conformational distortion, chemical modification, e.g., ubiquitination of a residue or residues in the colinear effector site, or by cleavage of a portion of all or part of the colinear effector site.

“Localization” includes determining the particular region of the subject of an entity of interest, e.g., a tumor.

“Kemptide” includes a synthetic cAMP peptide substrate corresponding to part of the phosphyorylation site sequence in porcine liver pyruvate kinase. “Malantide” includes cAMP-dependent protein kinase and protein kinase C substrate in various tissues.

“Small molecule” includes compositions that have a molecular weight of less than about 5 kD and most preferably less than about 4 kD. Small molecules can be, e.g., nucleic acids, peptides, polypeptides, peptidomimetics, carbohydrates, lipids or other organic or inorganic molecules. “Spread of infection” includes the spreading and colonization by a pathogen of host sites other than the initial infection site. The term can also include, however, growth in size and/or number of the pathogen at the initial infection site.

“Ligand” includes a molecule, a small molecule, a biomolecule, a drug, a peptide, a polypeptide, a protein, a protein complex, an antibody, a nucleic acid, or a cell.

“Ligand binding site” includes the location on the light-generating fusion protein to which a ligand binds, whereupon the light-generating polypeptide moiety is activated or inactivated as a direct or indirect consequence of ligand binding. Binding to the ligand binding site may be direct or indirect, e.g., via protein dimerization in conjunction with other proteins, as described hereinbelow.

“Targeting moiety” includes moieties which allow the light-generating fusion protein of the invention to be selectively delivered to a target organ or organs. For example, if delivery of a therapeutic compound to the brain is desired, the carrier molecule may include a moiety capable of targeting the compound to the brain, by either active or passive transport. Illustratively, the carrier molecule may include a redox moiety, as described in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,540,564 and 5,389,623, both to Bodor. These patents disclose drugs linked to dihydropyridine moieties which can enter the brain, where they are oxidized to a charged pyridinium species which is trapped in the brain. Thus, compound accumulates in the brain. Many targeting moieties are known, and include, for example, asialoglycoproteins (see, e.g. Wu, U.S. Pat. No. 5,166,320) and other ligands which are transported into cells via receptor-mediated endocytosis. Targeting moieties may be covalently or non-covalently bound to a light-generating fusion protein. The targeting moiety may also be attached to a vector.

“Bioluminescent” molecules or moieties include luminescent substances which utilize chemical energy to produce light.

“Fluorescent” molecules or moieties include those which are luminescent via a single electronically excited state, which is of very short duration after removal of the source of radiation. The wavelength of the emitted fluorescence light is longer than that of the exciting illumination (Stokes' Law), because part of the exciting light is converted into heat by the fluorescent molecule.

“Entities” include, without limitation, small molecules such as cyclic organic molecules; macromolecules such as proteins; polymers; proteins; polysaccharides; nucleic acids; particles, inert materials; organelles; microorganisms such as viruses, bacteria, yeast and fungi; cells, e.g., eukaryotic cells; embryos; prions; tumors; all types of pathogens and pathogenic substances; and particles such as beads and liposomes. In another aspect, entities may be all or some of the cells that constitute the mammalian subject being imaged, e.g., diseased or damaged tissue, or compounds or molecules produced by those cells, or by a condition under study. Entities for which the invention has particular utility include tumors, proliferating cells, pathogens, and cellular environments comprising hypoxic tissue.

“Infectious agents” include parasites, viruses, fungi, bacteria or prions.

“Promoter induction event” includes an event that results in the direct or indirect induction of a selected inducible promoter.

“Heterologous gene” includes a gene which has been transfected into a host organism. Typically, a heterologous gene refers to a gene that is not originally derived from the transfected or transformed cells' genomic DNA.

“Opaque medium” includes a medium that is “traditionally” opaque, not necessarily absolutely opaque. Accordingly, an opaque medium includes a medium that is commonly considered to be neither transparent nor translucent, and includes items such as a wood board, and flesh and skin of a mammal.

“HIFα polypeptide moiety” includes all or part of the amino acid sequence of HIF1α, HIF2α, or HIF3α.

“HIF1α polypeptide moiety” includes all or part of the amino acid sequence of HIF1α, e.g., SEQ ID NO: 9, the amino acid sequence corresponding to the N-terminal residues 1-600 of HIF1α, numbered in accordance with wild-type HIF1α, wherein either or both of residues 402 and 564 are proline or hydroxylated proline, or an 80 to 120, 20 to 30, 12 to 14, or 4 to 12 amino acid sequence corresponding to the residues adjacent to and/or surrounding residue 402 and/or 564, inclusive, of HIF1α, wherein residues 402 and/or 564 is proline or hydroxylated proline.

The invention relates in part to methods and compositions relating to detecting, localizing and quantifying enzyme activities and protein-protein interactions in vivo, in vitro and in silico using light-emitting fusion proteins. The fusion proteins contain domains capable of binding by enzymes and other ligands, and of being modified as a consequence of this binding. The light generating domains include, without limitation, regions from fluorescent proteins and bioluminescent proteins. Light emission is detected by known methods, such as detection with suitable instrumentation (such as a CCD camera) in vivo, in vitro or in silico, such as in a living cell or intact organism, a cell culture system, a tissue section, or an array.

Light-generating fusion proteins of the invention are capable of taking part in a luminescent reaction whereby different biological, biochemical, chemical and physical events are measured. The light-generating fusion protein is capable of being modified such that it does or does not emit light or cause light to be emitted. Light-generating fusion proteins include a ligand binding site and a light-generating polypeptide moiety, wherein the bioluminescence of the polypeptide moiety changes upon binding of a ligand at the ligand binding site.

Without wishing to be bound by interpretation, the ligand binding site acts as in a sense as a “switch” for the light-generating polypeptide moiety, i.e., when the ligand binds to the ligand binding site, the light-generating polypeptide moiety emits light, or alternately, ceases to do so upon ligand binding. The “switching” on or off, in embodiment, may be done by means of a “colinear effector site” which includes regions of the light-generating polypeptide moiety that, when acted on by events subsequent to ligand binding, cause the light-generating polypeptide moiety to change its present light-emitting state (i.e., on or off). The regions making up the colinear effector site may do this by, e.g., conformational distortion, chemical modification, e.g., ubiquitination of a residue or residues in the colinear effector site, or by cleavage of a portion of all or part of the colinear effector site.

The selection of a light-generating polypeptide moiety of the light-generating fusion protein should be done so as to produce light capable of penetrating animal tissue such that it can be detected externally in a non-invasive manner. The ability of light to pass through a medium such as animal tissue (composed mostly of water) is determined primarily by the light's intensity and wavelength.

The more intense the light produced in a unit volume, the easier the light will be to detect. The intensity of light produced in a unit volume depends on the spectral characteristics of individual bioluminescent polypeptide moieties, and on the concentration of those moieties in the unit volume. Accordingly, schemes that place a high concentration of bioluminescent polypeptide moieties in or on an entity (such as high-efficiency loading of a liposome or high-level expression of a light-generating fusion protein in a cell) typically produce brighter light-generating fusion proteins (LGPs), which are easier to detect through deeper layers of tissue, than schemes which conjugate, for example, only a single LGM onto each entity.

A second factor governing detectability through a layer of tissue is the wavelength of the emitted light. Water may be used to approximate the absorption characteristics of animal tissue, since most tissues are composed primarily of water. It is well known that water transmits longer wavelength light (in the red range) more readily than it does shorter wavelength light.

Accordingly, bioluminescent polypeptide moieties which emit light in the range of yellow to red (550-1100 nm) are typically preferable to those which emit at shorter wavelengths. However, excellent results can be achieved in practicing the present invention with LGMs that emit in the range of 486 nm, despite the fact that this is not an optimal emission wavelength.

Fluorescence-based Moieties. Because fluorescent molecules require input of light in order to luminesce, their use in the invention may be more involved than the use of bioluminescent molecules. Precautions are typically taken to shield the excitatory light so as not to contaminate the fluorescence photon signal being detected from the subject. Obvious precautions include the placement of an excitation filter at the radiation source. An appropriately-selected excitation filter blocks the majority of photons having a wavelength similar to that of the photons emitted by the fluorescent moiety. Similarly, a barrier filter is employed at the detector to screen out most of the photons having wavelengths other than that of the fluorescence photons. Filters such as those described above can be obtained from a variety of commercial sources, including Omega Optical, Inc. (Brattleboro, Vt.).

Alternatively, a laser producing high intensity light near the appropriate excitation wavelength, but not near the fluorescence emission wavelength, can be used to excite the fluorescent moieties. An x-y translation mechanism may be employed so that the laser can scan the subject, for example, as in a confocal microscope.

As an additional precaution, the radiation source may be placed behind the subject and shielded, such that the only radiation photons reaching the site of the detector are those that pass all the way through the subject. Furthermore, detectors may be selected that have a reduced sensitivity to wavelengths of light used to excite the fluorescent moiety.

An advantage of small fluorescent molecules is that they are less likely to interfere with the bioactivity of the entity to which they are attached than a would a larger light-generating moiety. In addition, commercially-available fluorescent molecules can be obtained with a variety of excitation and emission spectra that are suitable for use with the present invention. For example, Molecular Probes (Eugene, Oreg.) sells a number of fluorophores, including Lucifer Yellow (abs. at 428 nm, and emits at 535 nm) and Nile Red (abs. at 551 nm and emits at 636 nm). Further, the molecules can be obtained derivatized with a variety of groups for use with various conjugation schemes (e.g., from Molecular Probes).

Bioluminescence-based Moieties. The subjects of chemiluminescence (luminescence as a result of a chemical reaction) and bioluminescence (visible luminescence from living organisms) have, in many aspects, been thoroughly studied.

An advantage of bioluminescent moieties over fluorescent moieties, is that there is virtually no background in the signal. The only light detected is light that is produced by the exogenous bioluminescent moiety. In contrast, the light used to excite a fluorescent molecule often results in the fluorescence of substances other than the intended target. This is particularly true when the “background” is as complex as the internal environment of a living animal.

Ligands include, in a preferred embodiment, enzymes which are capable of modifying a light-generating polypeptide moiety such that it does or ceases to emit light when modified. In use, this happens when, e.g., the light-generating fusion protein comes in contact with a ligand on an entity or produced by the entity, and the ligand binds to the ligand binding site, altering the light-generating properties of the light-generating polypeptide moiety. Examples include the following.

In an especially useful embodiment of the present invention, a light-generating fusion protein comprising a binding site for an E3 ubiquitin ligase and a light-generating polypeptide moiety capable of being modified by E3 at a modification site can be used for diagnostic and treatment purposes. Ubiquitin ligases bind to colinear ‘T’ (see FIG. 1) present on their substrates. Examples include the SCF (Skp1/Cdc53/F-box) ubiquitin ligases, the VBC (pVHL/elongin B/elongin C) ubiquitin ligase, and the MDM2 ubiquitin ligase. It is already established that bioluminescent proteins such as GFP and luciferase can be fused to heterologous polypeptides without loss of activity. In some embodiments, the light-generating polypeptide moiety may be modified to include a surface exposed lysine residue accessible as a ubiquitin acceptor site. In a First embodiment, a light-generating fusion protein of the invention may be used to monitor ischemia in living tissues and animals. The First embodiment comprises a polypeptide derived from the HIF1α (hypoxia-inducible factor 1α) which acts as a binding site for VBC. This binding site is only recognized by VBC in the presence of oxygen as a result of proline hydroxylation. The light-generating fusion protein of the First embodiment is advantageously stable in hypoxic cells, but unstable in well oxygenated cells. In a related embodiment, the HIF-derived polypeptide described above may be fused to a suicide moiety such as a protein (such as HSV TK or an adenoviral protein like E1A), which can be used in selective killing of ischemic cells (such as in a solid tumor).

Binding and/or modification sites are well-known in the art for a variety of kinases including cyclin-dependent kinases, ATM/ATR, JNK kinases, and receptor tyrosine kinases. In one embodiment, a light-generating fusion protein may be fused to a binding site for a kinase of interest. In some embodiments, it is useful to introduce one or more binding sites for a selected kinase into the light-generating fusion protein. By way of example, since phosphorylated serine, threonine, and tyrosine, by virtue of their negative charges, frequently mimic aspartic acid and/or glutamic acid residues, individual aspartic acid and glutamic acid residues are replaced with serine, threonine, or tyrosine (in the context of the kinase modification site). Such substitutions may be made singly and in combination. In another embodiment, the modification site can be empirically determined by carrying out a linker scan of the bioluminescent protein using a linker encoding the kinase modification site. In yet another embodiment the light-generating polypeptide moiety is mutagenized (either random or targeted mutagenesis) to generate modification sites in which the light-generating polypeptide moiety is selectively inactivated or activated by the kinase; this mutagenesis is performed using cells (such as yeast) rendered conditional for the kinase. In still yet another embodiment, a kinase modification site is designed in silico based on comparison of the “canonical modification site” of the selected kinase to the primary sequence of the light-generating polypeptide moiety, coupled with knowledge of the three dimensional structure of the light-generating polypeptide moiety.

A Second embodiment of a light-generating fusion protein of the invention comprises a light-generating polypeptide moiety and a ligand binding site, where the ligand binding site comprises an nucleic acid, e.g., DNA, sequence capable of binding to a ligand which is a fusion protein comprising a nucleic acid binding domain and an enzyme which, upon contact, e.g., binding of the ligand and the ligand binding site, causes a modification of expression of a nucleic acid encoding a light-generating polypeptide moiety.

A non-limiting example of the Second embodiment is illustrated in Example 3, wherein light-generating fusion protein of the invention comprises a luciferase reporter (the light-generating polypeptide moiety), and TETo ((SEQ ID NO: 6), the ligand binding site), which binds to a ligand which is a fusion protein comprising a TETr (which binds to TETo) and cdk2 or cyclin E, which, upon binding of TETo to TETr, causes a modification of expression of a nucleic acid encoding a luciferase reporter, causing a change in luminescence. A non-limiting example of the nucleic acid sequence capable of being bound by the target polypeptide of this Second embodiment is the Tetracycline operator sequence (TETo; SEQ ID NO: 6.)

The Second embodiment of the invention is useful to dynamically image transcription in vivo, as detailed more specifically in Example 3. Since the Second embodiment of the invention, in part, relates to LGPs containing cyclin-binding domains, these LGPs are useful to dynamically quantify alterations in transcription of cell-cycle associated genes, such as oncogenes and tumor suppressors. A LGP containing a cyclin-binding moiety can be localized to regions undergoing cell proliferation, such as a tumor, and can be used to screen for and determine the efficacy of cell proliferation-modulating compounds.

In an additional embodiment described below, a light-generating polypeptide moiety is fused to a polypeptide recognized by a cyclin/cdk2 complex. This enzyme phosphorylates serine or threonine with an absolute requirement for proline in the +1 position. By way of example, GFP contains 13 proline residues including one threonine-proline site and two aspartic acid-proline sites. In one embodiment, a bioluminescent protein (e.g., GFP) is fused to a cyclin/cdk2 binding site such as Y-Lys-X₁-Leu-K-X₂-Leu-Y′ (SEQ ID NO. 14). The bioluminescent protein is phosphorylated and inactivated by cyclin/cdk2, providing a detectable signal which is selectively off in the presence of cyclin/cdk2. In another embodiment, the light-generating polypeptide moiety is mutated so that it is not phosphorylated and activated by cyclin/cdk2. An example of this mutation would be to mutate the two aspartic acid-proline sites to serine (or threonine)-prolines.

In this additional embodiment, the ligand binding site is a polypeptide recognized by a cyclin/cdk2 complex, e.g., comprising the amino acid sequence Y-Lys-X₁-Leu-K-X₂-Leu-Y′ (SEQ ID NO: 14), wherein X₁, X₂, are independently any one or more amino acids; and Y and Y′ are independently present or absent and, if present, independently comprise a peptide having from 1 to 600 amino acids.

An example of such a target peptide is RB: PKPLKKLRFD (SEQ ID NO: 1). In a related aspect of this additional embodiment, the ligand binding site comprises the amino acid sequence Y-X₁-Arg-Arg-Leu-Y′ (SEQ ID NO: 25), wherein X₁ is Lys or Cys; and Y and Y′ are independently present or absent and, if present, independently comprise a peptide having from 1 to 600 amino acids. Two non-limiting examples of the target peptide of this related aspect of this additional embodiment are: E2F1: GRPPVKRRLDLE (SEQ ID NO: 2); derived from the E2F1 protein, and p21: CCSKACRRLFGP (SEQ ID NO: 3), derived from the p21 protein.

The fusion protein of this additional embodiment can be produced by standard recombinant DNA techniques, discussed supra.

The ligand binding site of the light-generating fusion protein of this additional embodiment is derived from the retinoblastoma (RB) protein. Adams, et al., 1999 Mol. Cell Biol. 19:1068 describes RB protein. An RB polypeptide comprises 928 amino acid residues. As described in more detail below, this ligand binding site comprises a unique cyclin binding domain derived from RB. In the light-generating fusion protein described above, where present, Y comprises between 1 and 900 amino acid residues, preferably corresponding to the sequence of “N-terminal” RB amino acid residues 1-868. Thus, in a preferred embodiment Y can represent any sequence of N-terminal amino acids of RB, for example residues 794-829, and so on up to and including residues 1-868. Y′ can also comprise between 1 and 600 amino acid residues, preferably corresponding to the sequence of “C-terminal” RB amino acid residues 879-928. Thus, in a preferred embodiment, Y′ can represent any sequence of C-terminal amino acids of RB, for example 879-910, and so on up to and including residues 879-928. Y and Y′ can also contain conservative substitutions of amino acids present in the N-terminal and C-terminal RB sequences described above. In a further preferred embodiment, Y and Y′ are absent.

The light-generating fusion protein of this additional embodiment provides a way for detecting “cancerous tissue” or tissue subject to aberrant cell proliferation and therefore at risk for cancer. In addition to tissue that becomes cancerous due to an in situ neoplasm, for example, the light-generating fusion protein also provides a method of detecting cancerous metastatic tissue present in distal organs and/or tissues. Thus such tissue may be detected by contacting tissue suspected of being cancerous with the light-generating fusion protein under appropriate conditions to cause the phosphorylation of the light-generating fusion protein in cancerous tissue, thereby detecting the presence of cancerous tissue. The ligand binding site of the light-generating fusion protein of this embodiment provides a binding site for cyclin-cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) complexes which phosphorylate the protein, causing it to emit or not emit light in the presence of active cycle-cdk complexes. Under appropriate conditions, the light-generating fusion protein will therefore be unphosphorylated or inactive in tissue that is not cancerous, and phosphorylated and preserving its light-emitting properties in tissue that is cancerous, e.g. primary and metastatic tissue.

Phosphorylation is one of the most important ways to posttranslationally modify proteins, and it regulates diverse cell physiological processes (transport, proliferation, differentiation). For example, phosphorylation is involved in all phases of cell division: in transition from G1 to S phase, progression of cells during S phase and entry into M phase. The physiological function of oncoproteins and tumor suppressor proteins that are involved in gene expression and replication are also regulated by phosphorylation. Many growth factors and their receptors are encoded by oncogenes which are mutated or overexpressed in a variety of human tumors. Mutation or overexpression of these oncogenes leads to unchecked cell division, and transformation of normal cells to malignant. In an embodiment of the present invention, a light-generating fusion protein may include a phosphatase binding site and a modification site, such as a phosphorylated amino acid residue capable of being modified by a protein “phosphatase”.

For most proteases, the enzyme binding site and modification site are largely congruent and can be encompassed in short peptides. In an embodiment, a light-generating fusion protein may include a protease binding site and a modification site capable of being cleaved by the protease. The binding site and modification site may be the same site or in two discrete regions. In one embodiment, wherein the binding and modification site are congruent, linker scanning mutagenesis of a given bioluminescent protein is carried out using a linker that encodes the congruent binding/modification site. Resulting mutants are those light-generating fusion proteins containing a binding/modification site that preserves light-emitting activity in protease deficient cells and exhibits protease sensitivity in vitro and in vivo. In the Third embodiment described herein, a light-generating fusion protein containing an HIV protease site is especially useful for monitoring the presence or absence of HIV (in this case, with HIV-positive cells not emitting light). In an alternative embodiment, the light-generating fusion protein is fused via a linker to a protein that inhibits the light-emitting activity of the light-generating polypeptide moiety. The linker includes a binding/modification site for an HIV protease. Thus, cleavage at the binding/modification site should remove the inhibiting protein moiety, thus yielding a positive signal in cells that are HIV positive.

As shown generally in FIG. 1A, an embodiment of the fusion protein of the invention contains a ligand binding site “T”, a reporter domain (e.g., light-generating polypeptide moiety) “R”, and a modification site “X”. Binding of enzyme “E” (the ligand) to target site “T” results in a modification of modification site “X”, which causes the reporter domain “R” to either emit or not emit light.

The site “T” and modification site “X” may be separate and in cis on the fusion protein, as shown in FIG. 1B. Either “T” or “X” can be proximal or distal to the amino terminus of the fusion protein.

In another embodiment shown in FIG. 1C, wherein the “T” and the “X” of the fusion protein are congruent within a domain of the fusion protein. In related embodiments, the congruent “T/X” can be at the amino terminus, the carboxy terminus, or at neither terminus of the fusion protein.

In a further embodiment shown in FIG. 1D, the “T” is on a protein associated with the fusion protein containing the “X”. In a related embodiment, target site “T” is on the fusion protein and modification site “X” is on a protein that is physically associated with the fusion protein, wherein modification of the associated protein results in the fusion protein either emitting or not emitting light. The depiction of site “T” and modification site “X” are not intended to be limiting. “T” can be at the amino terminus, the carboxy terminus, or at neither terminus of the fusion protein, and “X” can be at the amino terminus, the carboxy terminus, or at neither terminus of the associated protein.

The invention also includes a fusion protein in which the ligand binding site sequence “T” is unknown. In this embodiment, e.g., as shown in FIG. 2A, the fusion protein includes a first hetero- or homo-dimerization domain (“HD1”). An enzyme “E” capable of modifying modification site “X” on the fusion protein is fused to a second hetero- or homo-dimerization domain “HD2” that interacts with “HD1”. In a related embodiment, the targeting site “T” for an enzyme “E” can be generated by inserting one or more polypeptide sequences derived from a random or non-random peptide library into the fusion protein.

In a related embodiment (FIG. 2B), a binding domain of a protein “A” containing an enzyme target site “T” interacts with a binding domain “B” of a fusion protein, which results in enzyme “E” modifying the reporter domain “R” of the fusion protein at modification site “X” such that the fusion protein does or does not emit light or cause light to be emitted. In the First embodiment, the ligand binding site comprises a polypeptide derived from the HIF1α (hypoxia-inducible factor 1α) which acts as a binding site for VBC, e.g., the amino acid sequence Y-X₁-Leu-X₂-Pro_(h)-X₃-X₄-X₅-X₆-Y′ (SEQ ID NO: 12), wherein

-   -   Pro_(h) is hydroxylated proline;     -   X₁, X₂, X₃, X₄, X₅, and X₆ are amino acids selected so as to not         modify or alter VHL binding properties. X₁, X₂, X₄, X₅, and X₆         are desirably independently Gly, Ala, Val, Leu, Ile, Pro, Met,         Phe, or Trp, and X₃ is desirably Ser, Thr, or Tyr; and     -   Y and Y′ are independently present or absent and, if present,         independently comprise a peptide having from 1 to 600 amino         acids.

In a preferred embodiment, the ligand binding site comprises the amino acid sequence corresponding to the N-terminal residues 1-600 of HIF1α, wherein either or both of residues 402 and 564 are proline or hydroxylated proline. In a more preferred embodiment, the ligand binding site comprises an 80 to 120, 20 to 30, 12 to 14, or 4 to 12 amino acid sequence corresponding to the residues adjacent to and/or surrounding residue 402 and/or 564, inclusive, of HIF1α, wherein residues 402 and/or 564 is proline or hydroxylated proline. “Residues adjacent to and/or surrounding” is meant to include the relevant sequence of HIF1α either before, after, or flanking, the specified residue, e.g., residue 564. In other embodiments, the ligand binding site of the invention comprises the amino acid sequence corresponding to the N-terminal portion of HIF2α or HIF3α.

Such proteins may be used effectively as oxygen-sensing proteins. The fusion proteins may be produced by standard recombinant DNA techniques. For example, DNA fragments coding for the different polypeptide sequences are ligated together in-frame in accordance with conventional techniques, e.g., by employing blunt-ended or stagger-ended termini for ligation, restriction enzyme digestion to provide for appropriate termini, filling-in of cohesive ends as appropriate, alkaline phosphatase treatment to avoid undesirable joining, and enzymatic ligation. In another embodiment, the fusion gene can be synthesized by conventional techniques including automated DNA synthesizers. Alternatively, PCR amplification of gene fragments can be carried out using anchor primers that give rise to complementary overhangs between two consecutive gene fragments that can subsequently be annealed and reamplified to generate a chimeric gene sequence (see, e.g., Ausubel et al. (eds.) CURRENT PROTOCOLS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, John Wiley & Sons, 1992).

The ligand binding site noted above is derived from HIF1α protein. U.S. Pat. No. 6,222,018, describes HIF protein and its preparation in substantially pure form. HIF is composed of subunits HIF1α and an isoform HIF1β. HIF1α polypeptide comprises 826 amino acid residues. As described in more detail below, the ligand binding sites of this particular fusion protein comprises a unique ubiquitin ligase binding domain derived from HIF1α. In this fusion protein, where present, Y comprises between 1 and 600 amino acid residue, preferably corresponding to the sequence of “N-terminal” HIF1α amino acid residues 1-555. Thus, in a preferred embodiment Y can represent any sequence of N-terminal amino acids of HIF1α, for example residues 554-555, 553-555, 552-555, and so on up to and including residues 1-555. Y′ can also comprises between 1 and 600 amino acid residues, preferably corresponding to the sequence of “C-terminal” HIF1α amino acid residues 576-826. Thus, in a preferred embodiment, Y′ can represent any sequence of C-terminal amino acids of HIF1α, for example 576-577, 576-578, 576-579, and so on up to and including residues 576-826. Y and Y′ can also contain conservative substitutions of amino acids present in the N-terminal and C-terminal HIF1α sequences described above. In a preferred embodiment of the ligand binding site defined above, Y and Y′ are absent. In a further preferred embodiment, X₁ is Met, X₂ is Leu, X₃ is Ala, X₄ is Tyr, X₅ is Pro, and X₆ is Met. In a particularly preferred embodiment of the fusion protein, the ligand binding site has the amino acid sequence Asp-Leu-Asp-Leu-Glu-Met-Leu-Ala-Pro_(h)-Tyr-Ile-Pro-Met-Asp-Asp-Asp-Phe-Gln-Leu-Arg, (SEQ ID NO: 15) corresponding to HIF1α amino acid residues 556-575, with a hydroxylated proline at amino acid residue 564.

The invention also provides a nucleic acid molecule encoding the fusion protein or polypeptide of the invention. (As used herein, the terms polypeptide and protein are interchangeable). An “isolated” nucleic acid molecule is one that is separated from other nucleic acid molecules that are present in the natural source of the nucleic acid. Examples of isolated nucleic acid molecules include, but are not limited to, recombinant DNA molecules contained in a vector, recombinant DNA molecules maintained in a heterologous host cell, partially or substantially purified nucleic acid molecules, and synthetic DNA or RNA molecules. Moreover, an “isolated” nucleic acid molecule, such as a cDNA molecule, can be substantially free of other cellular material or culture medium when produced by recombinant techniques, or of chemical precursors or other chemicals when chemically synthesized.

A nucleic acid of the invention can be amplified using cDNA, mRNA or alternatively, genomic DNA, as a template and appropriate oligonucleotide primers according to standard PCR amplification techniques. The nucleic acid so amplified can be cloned into an appropriate vector and characterized by DNA sequence analysis. Furthermore, oligonucleotides corresponding to the nucleotide sequences can be prepared by standard synthetic techniques, e.g., using an automated DNA synthesizer. The present invention therefore also provides a vector comprising the nucleic acid of the invention. In a preferred embodiment, the vector further comprises a promoter operably linked to the nucleic acid molecule. In a further preferred embodiment the invention provides a cell containing the vector of the invention.

The light-generating fusion protein of, e.g., the First embodiment provides a means for detecting hypoxic tissue or tissue subject to chronic hypoxia and therefore at risk for ischemia. In addition to tissue that becomes ischemic due to occurrence of a stroke, heart attack or embolism, for example, the fusion protein also provides a method of detecting ischemic tissue present in tumors. Thus the invention may be used to detect such tissue by contacting tissue suspected of being hypoxic with the light-generating fusion protein under appropriate conditions to cause the ubiquitination of the fusion protein in normoxic tissue, thereby detecting the presence of hypoxic tissue. As described more fully below, the ligand binding site of the light-generating fusion protein also provides a binding site for ubiquitin ligases which destroy the protein in the presence of oxygen. Under appropriate conditions, the light-generating fusion protein of the invention will therefore be “unstable” or destroyed in tissue that is not hypoxic, i.e., that is well oxygenated, and “stable” or preserving its light-emitting properties in tissue that is hypoxic, i.e. that lacks sufficient oxygen.

The Second embodiment of the invention is useful to dynamically image transcription in vivo. Since the Second embodiment of the invention, in part, relates to LGPs containing cyclin-binding domains, these LGPs are useful to dynamically quantify alterations in transcription of cell-cycle associated genes, such as oncogenes and tumor suppressors. A LGP containing a cyclin-binding moiety can be localized to regions undergoing cell proliferation, such as a tumor, and can be used to screen for and determine the efficacy of cell proliferation-modulating compounds.

The Third embodiment provides a means for detecting “infected tissue” or tissue subject to contact with infectious agents and therefore at risk for infection, e.g., monitoring the presence or absence of HIV. The ligand binding site of the Third embodiment comprises a binding site for a protease, such as an infection-associated protease. For example, protease cleavage sites of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) protein precursor Pr55 (gag) protein include p2/NC, NC/p1, and NC/TFP.

The ligand binding site of the light-generating fusion protein of this Third embodiment may be derived from the HIV-1 protein. One non-limiting example of the target peptide of this Third embodiment is:

Y-GSGIF*LETSL-Y′ (See Beck et al., (2000) Virology 274(2):391-401. (SEQ ID NO: 13)

Y and Y′ are independently present or absent and, if present, independently comprise a peptide having from 1 to 600 amino acids, and “*” indicates the cleavage site of the fusion protein by a protease.

In addition to tissue that becomes infected due to an acute or chronic infection by an infectious agent, for example, the light-generating fusion protein may be used in detecting infected tissue present in distal organs and/or tissues, e.g., by contacting tissue suspected of being infected with the light-generating fusion protein of the invention under appropriate conditions to cause the proteolysis of the light-generating fusion protein in infected tissue, thereby detecting the presence of infected tissue. The ligand binding site of the light-generating fusion protein of this Third embodiment provides a binding site for a protease which degrades or modifies the protein, causing it to emit or not emit light in the presence of one or more proteases. Under appropriate conditions, the light-generating fusion protein will therefore be proteolyzed or inactive in tissue that is infected (although there may be cases where proteolysis leads to light generation), and unproteolyzed and preserving its light-emitting properties in tissue that is infected.

A Fourth embodiment of a light-generating fusion protein of the invention comprises a light-generating polypeptide moiety and a ligand binding site, wherein the ligand binding site comprises an amino acid sequence capable of binding to an “associated” protein. The association can occur by covalent or non-covalent binding. This associated protein may itself be a light-generating fusion protein, comprising a binding polypeptide capable of binding to the light-emitting light-generating fusion protein and an enzyme capable of modifying the light-emitting light-generating fusion protein.

A non-limiting example of the target peptide of this Fourth embodiment is where an SH2 domain containing protein interacts with a phosphotyrosine-containing protein, such as:

-   -   HD1: EPQYEEIPIYL (SEQ ID NO: 4).

This target polypeptide contains an SH2-binding (phosphotyrosine) domain. Therefore, any associated protein with an SH2 domain should interact with the target peptide of the Fourth embodiment. A non-limiting example of the binding peptide of the associated protein of this Fourth embodiment is:

-   -   HD2: WNVGSSNR (Amino acids 624-631 of Accession No. P27986;         human PI3K p85 subunit; SEQ ID NO: 5).

Another non-limiting example of the Fourth embodiment would be to fuse the FK506 binding protein (FKBP12) domain moiety to GFP and the FRAP domain moiety to Skp1 or elonginC. Therefore in the presence of rapamycin, which promotes the high affinity interaction of FKBP12 and FRAP, the core E3 ligase machinery would bind to and destroy GFP, eliminating the bioluminescence wherever rapamycin is present.

The ligand binding site of the light-generating fusion protein of this Fourth embodiment is derived from the human SHC1 proteinprotein. See Pelicci et al., (1992) Cell 70:93-104, describes the SHC1 protein with an SH2 domain which is implicated in mitogenic signal transduction.

The light-generating fusion protein of this Fourth embodiment provides a means for detecting enzymatic activity where the enzyme binding site is undefined.

The invention includes entities which may have been modified or conjugated to include a light-generating fusion protein of the invention. Such conjugated or modified entities are referred to as light-emitting entities, or simply conjugates. The conjugates themselves may take the form of, for example, molecules, macromolecules, particles, microorganisms, or cells. The methods used to conjugate a light-generating fusion protein to an entity depend on the nature of the light-generating fusion protein and the entity. Exemplary conjugation methods are discussed in the context of the entities described below.

Small molecules. Small molecule entities which may be useful in the present invention include compounds which specifically interact with a pathogen or an endogenous ligand or receptor. Examples of such molecules include, but are not limited to, drugs or therapeutic compounds; toxins, such as those present in the venoms of poisonous organisms, including certain species of spiders, snakes, scorpions, dinoflagellates, marine snails and bacteria; growth factors, such as NGF, PDGF, TGF and TNF; cytokines; and bioactive peptides.

The small molecules are preferably conjugated to light-generating fusion proteins in a way that that with the bioactivity of the small molecule is not substantially affected. Conjugations are typically chemical in nature, and can be performed by any of a variety of methods known to those skilled in the art.

Small molecules conjugated to light-generating fusion proteins of the present invention may be used either in animal models of human conditions or diseases, or directly in human subjects to be treated. For example, a small molecule which binds with high affinity to receptor expressed on tumor cells may be used in an animal model to localize and obtain size estimates of tumors, and to monitor changes in tumor growth or metastasis following treatment with a putative therapeutic agent. Such molecules may also be used to monitor tumor characteristics, as described above, in cancer patients.

Macromolecules. Macromolecules, such as polymers and biopolymers, constitute another example of entities useful in practicing the present invention. Exemplary macromolecules include antibodies, antibody fragments, light-generating fusion proteins and certain vector constructs.

Antibodies or antibody fragments, purchased from commercial sources or made by methods known in the art, can be used to localize their antigen in a mammalian subject by conjugating the antibodies to a light-generating moiety, administering the conjugate to a subject by, for example, injection, allowing the conjugate to localize to the site of the antigen, and imaging the conjugate. For example, antibodies that are specific for a protein complex comprising HIF1α and pVHL can be generated. These antibodies may be conjugated to a light-generating moiety (e.g., fluorescein, rhodamine, GFP).

Antibodies and antibody fragments have several advantages for use as entities in the present invention. By their nature, they constitute their own targeting moieties. Further, their size makes them amenable to conjugation with several types of light-generating fusion proteins, including small fluorescent molecules and fluorescent and bioluminescent proteins, yet allows them to diffuse rapidly relative to, for example, cells or liposomes.

The light-generating fusion proteins can be conjugated directly to the antibodies or fragments, or indirectly by using, for example, a fluorescent secondary antibody. Direct conjugation can be accomplished by standard chemical coupling of, for example, a fluorophore to the antibody or antibody fragment, or through genetic engineering. Chimeras, or fusion proteins can be constructed which contain an antibody or antibody fragment coupled to a fluorescent or bioluminescent protein. For example, Casadei, et al., describe a method of making a vector construct capable of expressing a fusion protein of aequorin and an antibody gene in mammalian cells.

Conjugates containing antibodies can be used in a number of applications of the present invention. For example, a labeled antibody directed against E-selection, which is expressed at sites of inflammation, can be used to localize the inflammation and to monitor the effects of putative anti-inflammatory agents.

Vector constructs by themselves can also constitute macromolecular entities applicable to the present invention. For example, a eukaryotic expression vector can be constructed which contains a therapeutic gene and a gene encoding a light-generating molecule under the control of a selected promoter (i.e., a promoter which is expressed in the cells targeted by the therapeutic gene). Expression of the light-generating molecule, assayed using methods of the present invention, can be used to determine the location and level of expression of the therapeutic gene. This approach may be particularly useful in cases where the expression of the therapeutic gene has no immediate phenotype in the treated individual or animal model.

Viruses. Another entity useful for certain aspects of the invention are viruses. As many viruses are pathogens which infect mammalian hosts, the viruses may be conjugated to a light-generating fusion protein and used to study the initial site and spread of infection. In addition, viruses labeled with a light-generating fusion protein may be used to screen for drugs which inhibit the infection or the spread of infection.

A virus may be labeled indirectly, either with an antibody conjugated to a light-generating fusion protein, or by, for example, biotinylating virions as known in the art and then exposing them to streptavidin linked to a detectable moiety, such as a fluorescent molecule.

Alternatively, virions may be labeled directly with a fluorophore like rhodamine, using methods known in the art. The virus can also be genetically engineered to express a light-generating fusion protein. Labeled virus can be used in animal models to localize and monitor the progression of infection, as well as to screen for drugs effective to inhibit the spread of infection. For example, while herpes virus infections are manifested as skin lesions, this virus can also cause herpes encephalitis. Such an infection can be localized and monitored using a virus labeled by any of the methods described above, and various antiviral agents can be tested for efficacy in central nervous system (CNS) infections.

Particles. Particles, including beads, liposomes and the like, constitute another entity useful in the practice of the present invention. Due to their larger size, particles may be conjugated with a larger number of light-generating fusion proteins than, for example, can small molecules. This results in a higher concentration of light emission, which can be detected using shorter exposures or through thicker layers of tissue. In addition, liposomes can be constructed to contain an essentially pure targeting moiety, or ligand, such as an antigen or an antibody, on their surface. Further, the liposomes may be loaded with, for example, bioluminescent protein molecules, to relatively high concentrations.

Furthermore, two types of liposomes may be targeted to the same cell type such that light is generated only when both are present. For example, one liposome may carry luciferase, while the other carries luciferin. The liposomes may carry targeting moieties, and the targeting moieties on the two liposomes may be the same or different. Viral proteins on infected cells can be used to identify infected tissues or organs. Cells of the immune system can be localized using a single or multiple cell surface markers.

The liposomes are preferably surface-coated, e.g., by incorporation of phospholipid—polyethyleneglycol conjugates, to extend blood circulation time and allow for greater targeting via the bloodstream. Liposomes of this type are well known.

Cells. Cells, both prokaryotic and eukaryotic, constitute another entity useful in the practice of the present invention. Like particles, cells can be loaded with relatively high concentrations of light-generating moieties, but have the advantage that the light-generating moieties can be provided by, for example, a heterologous genetic construct used to transfect the cells. In addition, cells can be selected that express “targeting moieties”, or molecules effective to target them to desired locations within the subject. Alternatively, the cells can be transfected with a vector construct expressing an appropriate targeting moiety.

The cell type used depends on the application. For example, bacterial cells can be used to study the infective process, and to evaluate the effects of drugs or therapeutic agents on the infective process with a high level of temporal and spatial resolution. Bacterial cells constitute effective entities. For example, they can be easily transfected to express a high levels of a light-generating fusion protein, as well as high levels of a targeting protein. In addition, it is possible to obtain E. coli libraries containing bacteria expressing surface-bound antibodies which can be screened to identify a colony expressing an antibody against a selected antigen (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). Bacteria from this colony can then be transformed with a second plasmid containing a gene for a light-generating protein, and transformants can be utilized in the methods of the present invention, as described above, to localize the antigen in a mammalian host.

Pathogenic bacteria can be conjugated to a light-generating fusion protein and used in an animal model to follow the infection process in vivo and to evaluate potential anti-infective drugs, such as new antibiotics, for their efficacy in inhibiting the infection.

Eukaryotic cells are also useful as entities in aspects of the present invention. Appropriate expression vectors, containing desired regulatory elements, are commercially available. The vectors can be used to generate constructs capable of expressing desired light-generating proteins in a variety of eukaryotic cells, including primary culture cells, somatic cells, lymphatic cells, etc. The cells can be used in transient expression studies, or, in the case of cell lines, can be selected for stable transformants.

Expression of the light-generating protein in transformed cells can be regulated using any of a variety of selected promoters. For example, if the cells are to be used as light-emitting entities targeted to a site in the subject by an expressed ligand or receptor, a constitutively-active promoter, such as the CMV or SV40 promoter may be used. Cells transformed with such a construct can also be used to assay for compounds that inhibit light generation, for example, by killing the cells.

Alternatively, the transformed cells may be administered such they become uniformly distributed in the subject, and express the light-generating fusion protein only under certain conditions, such as upon infection by a virus or stimulation by a cytokine. Promoters that respond to factors associated with these and other stimuli are known in the art. In a related aspect, inducible promoters, such as the Tet system can be used to transiently activate expression of the light-generating protein.

For example, CD4+ lymphatic cells can be transformed with a construct containing tat-responsive HIV LTR elements, and used as an assay for infection by HIV. Cells transformed with such a construct can be introduced into SCID-hu mice and used as model for human HIV infection and AIDS.

Tumor cell lines transformed to express the light-generating fusion protein, for example, with a constitutively-active promoter, may be used to monitor the growth and metastasis of tumors. Transformed tumor cells may be injected into an animal model, allowed to form a tumor mass, and the size and metastasis of the tumor mass monitored during treatment with putative growth or metastasis inhibitors. Tumor cells may also be generated from cells transformed with constructs containing regulatable promoters, whose activity is sensitive to various infective agents, or to therapeutic compounds.

Cell Transformation. Transformation methods for both prokaryotic cells and eukaryotic cells are well known in the art. Vectors containing the appropriate regulatory elements and multiple cloning sites are widely commercially available (e.g., Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif., or Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.).

In another aspect, the present invention includes transgenic animals containing a heterologous gene construct encoding a light-generating fusion protein or complex of proteins. The construct is driven by a selected promoter, and can include, for example, various accessory proteins required for the functional expression of the light-generating protein, as well as selection markers and enhancer elements.

Activation of the promoter results in increased expression of the genes encoding the light-generating fusion proteins and accessory proteins. Activation of the promoter is achieved by the interaction of a selected biocompatible entity, or parts of the entity, with the promoter elements. If the activation occurs only in a part of the animal, only cells in that part will express the light-generating protein.

Light-generating fusion proteins are typically administered to a subject by any of a variety of methods, allowed to localize within the subject, and imaged. Since the imaging, or measuring photon emission from the subject, may last up to tens of minutes, the subject is desirably immobilized during the imaging process. Imaging of the light-generating polypeptide moiety involves the use of, e.g., a photodetector capable of detecting extremely low levels of light—typically single photon events—and integrating photon emission until an image can be constructed. Examples of such sensitive photodetectors include devices that intensify the single photon events before the events are detected by a camera, and cameras (cooled, for example, with liquid nitrogen) that are capable of detecting single photons over the background noise inherent in a detection system.

Once a photon emission image is generated, it is typically superimposed on a “normal” reflected light image of the subject to provide a frame of reference for the source of the emitted photons (i.e., localize the light-generating fusion proteins with respect to the subject). Such a “composite” image is then analyzed to determine the location and/or amount of a target in the subject.

Light-generating fusion proteins that have localized to their intended sites in a subject may be imaged in a number of ways. Guidelines for such imaging, as well as specific examples, are described below.

Localization of Light-generating fusion proteins. In the case of “targeted” conjugates, that is, conjugates which contain a targeting moiety—a molecule or feature designed to localize the conjugate within a subject or animal at a particular site or sites, localization refers to a state when an equilibrium between bound, “localized”, and unbound, “free” entities within a subject has been essentially achieved. The rate at which such an equilibrium is achieved depends upon the route of administration. For example, a conjugate administered by intravenous injection to localize thrombi may achieve localization, or accumulation at the thrombi, within minutes of injection. On the other hand, a conjugate administered orally to localize an infection in the intestine may take hours to achieve localization.

Alternatively, localization may simply refer to the location of the entity within the subject or animal at selected time periods after the entity is administered. In a related aspect, localization of, for example, injected tumors cells expressing a light-generating moiety, may consist of the cells colonizing a site within the animal and forming a tumor mass.

By way of another example, localization is achieved when an entity becomes distributed following administration. For example, in the case of a conjugate administered to measure the oxygen concentration in various organs throughout the subject or animal, the conjugate becomes “localized”, or informative, when it has achieved an essentially steady-state of distribution in the subject or animal.

In all of the above cases, a reasonable estimate of the time to achieve localization may be made by one skilled in the art. Furthermore, the state of localization as a function of time may be followed by imaging the light-emitting conjugate according to the methods of the invention.

The “photodetector device” used should have a high enough sensitivity to enable the imaging of faint light from within a mammal in a reasonable amount of time, and to use the signal from such a device to construct an image.

In cases where it is possible to use light-generating moieties which are extremely bright, and/or to detect light-generating fusion proteins localized near the surface of the subject or animal being imaged, a pair of “night-vision” goggles or a standard high-sensitivity video camera, such as a Silicon Intensified Tube (SIT) camera (e.g., from Hammamatsu Photonic Systems, Bridgewater, N.J.), may be used. More typically, however, a more sensitive method of light detection is required.

In extremely low light levels the photon flux per unit area becomes so low that the scene being imaged no longer appears continuous. Instead, it is represented by individual photons which are both temporally and spatially distinct form one another. Viewed on a monitor, such an image appears as scintillating points of light, each representing a single detected photon. By accumulating these detected photons in a digital image processor over time, an image can be acquired and constructed. In contrast to conventional cameras where the signal at each image point is assigned an intensity value, in photon counting imaging the amplitude of the signal carries no significance. The objective is to simply detect the presence of a signal (photon) and to count the occurrence of the signal with respect to its position over time.

At least two types of photodetector devices, described below, can detect individual photons and generate a signal which can be analyzed by an image processor. Reduced-Noise Photodetection Devices achieve sensitivity by reducing the background noise in the photon detector, as opposed to amplifying the photon signal. Noise is reduced primarily by cooling the detector array. The devices include charge coupled device (CCD) cameras referred to as “backthinned”, cooled CCD cameras. In the more sensitive instruments, the cooling is achieved using, for example, liquid nitrogen, which brings the temperature of the CCD array to approximately −120° C. “Backthinned” refers to an ultra-thin backplate that reduces the path length that a photon follows to be detected, thereby increasing the quantum efficiency. A particularly sensitive backthinned cryogenic CCD camera is the “TECH 512”, a series 200 camera available from Photometrics, Ltd. (Tucson, Ariz.).

“Photon amplification devices” amplify photons before they hit the detection screen. This class includes CCD cameras with intensifiers, such as microchannel intensifiers. A microchannel intensifier typically contains a metal array of channels perpendicular to and co-extensive with the detection screen of the camera. The microchannel array is placed between the sample, subject, or animal to be imaged, and the camera. Most of the photons entering the channels of the array contact a side of a channel before exiting. A voltage applied across the array results in the release of many electrons from each photon collision. The electrons from such a collision exit their channel of origin in a “shotgun” pattern, and are detected by the camera.

Even greater sensitivity can be achieved by placing intensifying microchannel arrays in series, so that electrons generated in the first stage in turn result in an amplified signal of electrons at the second stage. Increases in sensitivity, however, are achieved at the expense of spatial resolution, which decreases with each additional stage of amplification. An exemplary microchannel intensifier-based single-photon detection device is the C2400 series, available from Hamamatsu.

Image Processors process signals generated by photodetector devices which count photons in order to construct an image which can be, for example, displayed on a monitor or printed on a video printer. Such image processors are typically sold as part of systems which include the sensitive photon-counting cameras described above, and accordingly, are available from the same sources. The image processors are usually connected to a personal computer, such as an IBM-compatible PC or an Apple Macintosh (Apple Computer, Cupertino, Calif.), which may or may not be included as part of a purchased imaging system. Once the images are in the form of digital files, they can be manipulated by a variety of image processing programs (such as “ADOBE PHOTOSHOP”, Adobe Systems, Adobe Systems, Mt. View, Calif.) and printed.

The Detection Field Of The Device is defined as the area from which consistent measurements of photon emission can be obtained. In the case of a camera using an optical lens, the detection field is simply the field of view accorded to the camera by the lens. Similarly, if the photodetector device is a pair of “night vision” goggles, the detection field is the field of view of the goggles.

Alternatively, the detection field may be a surface defined by the ends of fiber-optic cables arranged in a tightly-packed array. The array is constructed to maximize the area covered by the ends of the cables, as opposed to void space between cables, and placed in close proximity to the subject. For instance, a clear material such as plexiglass can be placed adjacent the subject, and the array fastened adjacent the clear material, opposite from the subject.

The fiber-optic cable ends opposite the array can be connected directly to the detection or intensifying device, such as the input end of a microchannel intensifier, eliminating the need for a lens. An advantage of this method is that scattering and/or loss of photons is reduced by eliminating a large part of the air space between the subject and the detector, and/or by eliminating the lens. Even a high-transmission lens transmits only a fraction of the light reaching the front lens element.

With higher-intensity LGPs, photodiode arrays may be used to measure photon emission. A photodiode array can be incorporated into a relatively flexible sheet, enabling the practitioner to partially “wrap” the array around the subject. This approach also minimizes photon loss, and in addition, provides a means of obtaining three-dimensional images of the bioluminescence. Other approaches may be used to generate three-dimensional images, including multiple detectors placed around the subject or a scanning detector or detectors.

It will be understood that the entire animal or subject need not necessarily be in the detection field of the photodetection device. For example, if one is measuring a light-emitting conjugate known to be localized in a particular region of the subject, only light from that region, and a sufficient surrounding “dark” zone, need be measured to obtain the desired information.

Immobilizing the subject. In those cases where it is desired to generate a two-dimensional or three-dimensional image of the subject, the subject may be immobilized in the detection field of the photodetection devices during the period that photon emission is being measured. If the signal is sufficiently bright that an image can be constructed from photon emission measured in less than about 20 milliseconds, and the subject is not particularly agitated, no special immobilization precautions may be required, except to insure that the subject is in the field of the detection device at the start of the measuring period.

If, on the other hand, the photon emission measurement takes longer than about 20 msec, and the subject is agitated, precautions to insure immobilization of the subject during photon emission measurement, commensurate with the degree of agitation of the subject, need to be considered to preserve the spatial information in the constructed image. For example, in a case where the subject is a person and photon emission measurement time is on the order of a few seconds, the subject may simply be asked to remain as still as possible during photon emission measurement (imaging). On the other hand, if the subject is an animal, such as a mouse, the subject can be immobilized using, for example, an anesthetic or a mechanical restraining device.

In cases where it is desired to measure only the total amount of light emanating from a subject or animal, the subject does not necessarily need to be immobilized, even for long periods of photon emission measurements. All that is required is that the subject be confined to the detection field of the photodetector during imaging. It will be appreciated, however, that immobilizing the subject during such measuring may improve the consistency of results obtained, because the thickness of tissue through which detected photons pass will be more uniform from animal to animal.

Further Considerations During Imaging

The visualization of fluorescent light-generating moieties requires an excitation light source, as well as a photodetector. Furthermore, it will be understood that the excitation light source is turned on during the measuring of photon emission from the light-generating moiety.

Appropriate selection of a fluorophore, placement of the light source and selection and placement of filters, all of which facilitate the construction of an informative image, are discussed above, in the section on fluorescent light-generating moieties.

High-Resolution Imaging. Photon scattering by tissue limits the resolution that can be obtained by imaging LGMs through a measurement of total photon emission. It will be understood that the present invention also includes embodiments in which the light-generation of LGMs is synchronized to an external source which can be focused at selected points within the subject, but which does not scatter significantly in tissue, allowing the construction of higher-resolution images. For example, a focused ultrasound signal can be used to scan, in three dimensions, the subject being imaged. Light-generation from areas which are in the focal point of the ultrasound can be resolved from other photon emission by a characteristic oscillation imparted to the light by the ultrasound.

Constructing an Image of Photon Emission. In cases where, due to an exceptionally bright light-generating moiety and/or localization of light-generating fusion proteins near the surface of the subject, a pair of “night-vision” goggles or a high sensitivity video camera was used to obtain an image, the image is simply viewed or displayed on a video monitor. If desired, the signal from a video camera can be diverted through an image processor, which can store individual video frames in memory for analysis or printing, and/or can digitize the images for analysis and printing on a computer.

Alternatively, if a photon counting approach is used, the measurement of photon emission generates an array of numbers, representing the number of photons detected at each pixel location, in the image processor. These numbers are used to generate an image, typically by normalizing the photon counts (either to a fixed, pre-selected value, or to the maximum number detected in any pixel) and converting the normalized number to a brightness (greyscale) or to a color (pseudocolor) that is displayed on a monitor. In a pseudocolor representation, typical color assignments are as follows. Pixels with zero photon counts are assigned black, low counts blue, and increasing counts colors of increasing wavelength, on up to red for the highest photon count values. The location of colors on the monitor represents the distribution of photon emission, and, accordingly, the location of light-generating fusion proteins.

In order to provide a frame of reference for the conjugates, a greyscale image of the (still immobilized) subject from which photon emission was measured is typically constructed. Such an image may be constructed, for example, by opening a door to the imaging chamber, or box, in dim room light, and measuring reflected photons (typically for a fraction of the time it takes to measure photon emission). The greyscale image may be constructed either before measuring photon emission, or after. The image of photon emission is typically superimposed on the greyscale image to produce a composite image of photon emission in relation to the subject.

If it is desired to follow the localization and/or the signal from a light-emitting conjugate over time, for example, to record the effects of a treatment on the distribution and/or localization of a selected biocompatible moiety, the measurement of photon emission, or imaging can be repeated at selected time intervals to construct a series of images. The intervals can be as short as minutes, or as long as days or weeks.

Analysis of Photon Emission Images generated by methods and/or using compositions of the present invention may be analyzed by a variety of methods. They range from a simple visual examination and/or printing of a hardcopy, to sophisticated digital image analysis. Interpretation of the information obtained from an analysis depends on the phenomenon under observation and the entity being used.

Applications: Localization of Tumor Cells

The growth and metastatic spread of tumors in a subject may be monitored using methods and compositions of the present invention. In particular, in cases where an individual is diagnosed with a primary tumor, LGPs directed against the cells of the tumor can be used to both define the boundaries of the tumor, and to determine whether cells from the primary tumor mass have migrated and colonized distal sites. For example, LGPs, such as liposomes containing antibodies directed against tumor antigens and loaded with LGPs, can be administered to a subject, allowed to bind to tumor cells in the subject, imaged, and the areas of photon emission can be correlated with areas of tumor cells.

In a related aspect, images utilizing tumor-localizing LGPs, such as those described above, may be generated at selected time intervals to monitor tumor growth, progression and metastasis in a subject over time. Such monitoring may be useful to record results of anti-tumor therapy, or as part of a screen of putative therapeutic compounds useful in inhibiting tumor growth or metastasis.

In the practice of the invention, the tissue and the light-generating fusion protein can be contacted in vitro, such as where one or more biological samples (e.g., blood, serum, cells, tissue) are arrayed on a substrate under tissue culture conditions known by those in the art to preserve the viability of the tissue and then the fusion protein is added to the tissue culture. In a preferred embodiment of the methods of the invention the tissue is mammalian tissue, in particular human tissue.

The methods of the invention can also be practiced in vivo wherein the biological sample and the light-generating fusion protein are contacted by administration of the fusion protein (or a vector encoding the same) to a subject suspected of containing ischemic tissue under conditions to allow detection of the fusion protein in ischemic tissue present in the subject. The invention thus also pertains to the field of predictive medicine in which diagnostic assays, prognostic assays, pharmacogenomics, and monitoring clinical trials are used for prognostic (predictive) purposes to thereby treat an individual prophylactically. Accordingly, one aspect of the invention relates to diagnostic assays for determining the presence of ischemic tissue in a biological sample to thereby determine whether an individual is afflicted with a disease or disorder, or is at risk of developing a disorder, associated with hypoxic conditions. The invention also provides for prognostic (or predictive) assays for determining whether an individual is at risk of developing conditions arising from ischemia.

Another aspect of the invention provides methods for determining hypoxic conditions, cancer or infection in an individual to thereby select appropriate therapeutic or prophylactic agents for that individual (referred to herein as “pharmacogenomics”). Pharmacogenomics allows for the selection of agents (e.g., drugs) for therapeutic or prophylactic treatment of an individual based on the genotype of the individual (e.g., the genotype of the individual examined to determine the ability of the individual to respond to a particular agent.) Yet another aspect of the invention pertains to monitoring the influence of agents (e.g., drugs, compounds) on hypoxic conditions, cancer or infection in clinical trials.

The invention also encompasses kits for detecting the presence of hypoxic conditions, cancer or infection or ischemic, cancerous or infected tissue in a biological sample. For example, the kit can comprise the fusion protein of the invention packaged in a suitable container. The kit can further comprise instructions for using the kit to detect hypoxic conditions, cancer or infection or ischemic, cancerous or infected tissue.

Thus, the diagnostic methods described herein can furthermore be utilized to identify subjects having or at risk of developing a disease or disorder associated with hypoxic conditions, cancer or infection. Furthermore, the prognostic assays described herein can be used to determine whether a subject should be administered an agent (e.g., an agonist, antagonist, peptidomimetic, protein, peptide, nucleic acid, small molecule, or other drug candidate) to treat a disease or disorder associated with hypoxic conditions, cancer or infection.

The invention further provides a method for testing a compound for activity in promoting HIF stabilization which comprises contacting the compound, ischemic tissue, and the fusion protein of the invention under conditions appropriate to detect the fusion protein if the compound promotes HIF stabilization. The method (also referred to herein as a “screening assay”) can be used for identifying modulators, i.e., candidate or test compounds or agents (e.g., peptides, peptidomimetics, small molecules or other drugs) that promote HIF stabilization. The invention also includes compounds identified in the screening assays described herein.

The test compounds of the invention can be obtained using any of the numerous approaches in combinatorial library methods known in the art, including: biological libraries; spatially addressable parallel solid phase or solution phase libraries; synthetic library methods requiring deconvolution; the “one-bead one-compound” library method; and synthetic library methods using affinity chromatography selection. The biological library approach is limited to peptide libraries, while the other four approaches are applicable to peptide, non-peptide oligomer or small molecule libraries of compounds. See, e.g., Lam, 1997. Anticancer Drug Design 12: 145.

Libraries of chemical and/or biological mixtures, such as fungal, bacterial, or algal extracts, are known in the art and can be screened with any of the assays of the invention. Examples of methods for the synthesis of molecular libraries can be found in the art, for example in: DeWitt, et al., 1993. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90: 6909; Erb, et al., 1994. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91: 11422; Zuckermann, et al., 1994. J. Med. Chem. 37: 2678; Cho, et al., 1993. Science 261: 1303; Carrell, et al., 1994. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 33: 2059; Carell, et al., 1994. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 33: 2061; and Gallop, et al., 1994. J. Med. Chem. 37: 1233.

Libraries of compounds may be presented in solution (e.g., Houghten, 1992. Biotechniques 13: 412-421), or on beads (Lam, 1991. Nature 354: 82-84), on chips (Fodor, 1993. Nature 364: 555-556), bacteria (Ladner, U.S. Pat. No. 5,223,409), spores (Ladner, U.S. Pat. No. 5,233,409), plasmids (Cull, et al., 1992. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 1865-1869) or on phage (Scott and Smith, 1990. Science 249: 386-390; Devlin, 1990. Science 249: 404-406; Cwirla, et al., 1990. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87: 6378-6382; Felici, 1991. J. Mol. Biol. 222: 301-310; Ladner, U.S. Pat. No. 5,233,409.).

The invention further pertains to novel agents identified by the aforementioned screening assays and uses thereof in pharmaceutical compositions for treatments as described herein. The pharmaceutical compositions of the invention comprise the novel agents combined with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The term “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” is intended to include any and all solvents, dispersion media, coatings, antibacterial and antifungal agents, isotonic and absorption delaying agents, and the like, compatible with pharmaceutical administration. Suitable carriers are described in the most recent edition of Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, a standard reference text in the field, which is incorporated herein by reference. Preferred examples of such carriers or diluents include, but are not limited to, water, saline, finger's solutions, dextrose solution, and 5% human serum albumin. Liposomes and non-aqueous vehicles such as fixed oils may also be used. The use of such media and agents for pharmaceutically active substances is well known in the art. Except insofar as any conventional media or agent is incompatible with the active compound, use thereof in the compositions is contemplated. Supplementary active compounds can also be incorporated into the compositions.

A pharmaceutical composition of the invention is formulated to be compatible with its intended route of administration. Examples of routes of administration include parenteral, e.g., intravenous, intradermal, subcutaneous, oral (e.g., inhalation), transdermal (i.e., topical), transmucosal, and rectal administration. Solutions or suspensions used for parenteral, intradermal, or subcutaneous application can include the following components: a sterile diluent such as water for injection, saline solution, fixed oils, polyethylene glycols, glycerine, propylene glycol or other synthetic solvents; antibacterial agents such as benzyl alcohol or methyl parabens; antioxidants such as ascorbic acid or sodium bisulfite; chelating agents such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); buffers such as acetates, citrates or phosphates, and agents for the adjustment of tonicity such as sodium chloride or dextrose. The pH can be adjusted with acids or bases, such as hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide. The parenteral preparation can be enclosed in ampoules, disposable syringes or multiple dose vials made of glass or plastic.

Pharmaceutical compositions suitable for injectable use include sterile aqueous solutions (where water soluble) or dispersions and sterile powders for the extemporaneous preparation of sterile injectable solutions or dispersion. For intravenous administration, suitable carriers include physiological saline, bacteriostatic water, Cremophor EL™ (BASF, Parsippany, N.J.) or phosphate buffered saline (PBS). In all cases, the composition must be sterile and should be fluid to the extent that easy syringeability exists. It must be stable under the conditions of manufacture and storage and must be preserved against the contaminating action of microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi. The carrier can be a solvent or dispersion medium containing, for example, water, ethanol, polyol (for example, glycerol, propylene glycol, and liquid polyethylene glycol, and the like), and suitable mixtures thereof. The proper fluidity can be maintained, for example, by the use of a coating such as lecithin, by the maintenance of the required particle size in the case of dispersion and by the use of surfactants. Prevention of the action of microorganisms can be achieved by various antibacterial and antifungal agents, for example, parabens, chlorobutanol, phenol, ascorbic acid, thimerosal, and the like. In many cases, it will be preferable to include isotonic agents, for example, sugars, polyalcohols such as manitol, sorbitol, sodium chloride in the composition. Prolonged absorption of the injectable compositions can be brought about by including in the composition an agent which delays absorption, for example, aluminum monostearate and gelatin.

Sterile injectable solutions can be prepared by incorporating the active compound in the required amount in an appropriate solvent with one or a combination of ingredients enumerated above, as required, followed by filtered sterilization. Generally, dispersions are prepared by incorporating the active compound into a sterile vehicle that contains a basic dispersion medium and the required other ingredients from those enumerated above. In the case of sterile powders for the preparation of sterile injectable solutions, methods of preparation are vacuum drying and freeze-drying that yields a powder of the active ingredient plus any additional desired ingredient from a previously sterile-filtered solution thereof.

Oral compositions generally include an inert diluent or an edible carrier. They can be enclosed in gelatin capsules or compressed into tablets. For the purpose of oral therapeutic administration, the active compound can be incorporated with excipients and used in the form of tablets, troches, or capsules. Oral compositions can also be prepared using a fluid carrier for use as a mouthwash, wherein the compound in the fluid carrier is applied orally and swished and expectorated or swallowed. Pharmaceutically compatible binding agents, and/or adjuvant materials can be included as part of the composition. The tablets, pills, capsules, troches and the like can contain any of the following ingredients, or compounds of a similar nature: a binder such as microcrystalline cellulose, gum tragacanth or gelatin; an excipient such as starch or lactose, a disintegrating agent such as alginic acid, Primogel, or corn starch; a lubricant such as magnesium stearate or Sterotes; a glidant such as colloidal silicon dioxide; a sweetening agent such as sucrose or saccharin; or a flavoring agent such as peppermint, methyl salicylate, or orange flavoring.

For administration by inhalation, the compounds are delivered in the form of an aerosol spray from pressured container or dispenser which contains a suitable propellant, e.g., a gas such as carbon dioxide, or a nebulizer.

Systemic administration can also be by transmucosal or transdermal means. For transmucosal or transdermal administration, penetrants appropriate to the barrier to be permeated are used in the formulation. Such penetrants are generally known in the art, and include, for example, for transmucosal administration, detergents, bile salts, and fusidic acid derivatives. Transmucosal administration can be accomplished through the use of nasal sprays or suppositories. For transdermal administration, the active compounds are formulated into ointments, salves, gels, or creams as generally known in the art.

The compounds can also be prepared in the form of suppositories (e.g., with conventional suppository bases such as cocoa butter and other glycerides) or retention enemas for rectal delivery.

In one embodiment, the active compounds are prepared with carriers that will protect the compound against rapid elimination from the body, such as a controlled release formulation, including implants and microencapsulated delivery systems. Biodegradable, biocompatible polymers can be used, such as ethylene vinyl acetate, polyanhydrides, polyglycolic acid, collagen, polyorthoesters, and polylactic acid. Methods for preparation of such formulations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The materials can also be obtained commercially from Alza Corporation and Nova Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Liposomal suspensions (including liposomes targeted to infected cells with monoclonal antibodies to viral antigens) can also be used as pharmaceutically acceptable carriers. These can be prepared according to methods known to those skilled in the art, for example, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,522,811.

It is especially advantageous to formulate oral or parenteral compositions in dosage unit form for ease of administration and uniformity of dosage. Dosage unit form as used herein refers to physically discrete units suited as unitary dosages for the subject to be treated; each unit containing a predetermined quantity of active compound calculated to produce the desired therapeutic effect in association with the required pharmaceutical carrier. The specification for the dosage unit forms of the invention are dictated by and directly dependent on the unique characteristics of the active compound and the particular therapeutic effect to be achieved, and the limitations inherent in the art of compounding such an active compound for the treatment of individuals.

Referring now to the Drawings, FIG. 1A is a schematic representation of different fusion proteins of the present invention. “T” indicates the enzyme target site on the fusion protein, “E” indicates the enzyme, “X” indicates the modification site on the fusion protein, and “R” indicates the reporter domain of the fusion protein. The modification at “X” by “E” results in the fusion protein becoming active or inactive “On/Off”. FIG. 1B shows an embodiment wherein the “T” and the “X” are separate domains and are in cis on the fusion protein. FIG. 1C shows an embodiment of the invention wherein the “T” and the “X” of the fusion protein are congruent within a domain of the fusion protein. FIG. 1D shows an embodiment of the invention wherein the “T” is on a protein associated with the fusion protein containing the “X”.

FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of different fusion proteins of the present invention. FIG. 2A is a schematic representation of a fusion protein and associated protein of the present invention in which a fusion protein and an associated protein “A” contains a known homo- or hetero-dimerization domain “HD” corresponding to the enzyme target site of an enzyme, where binding of the enzyme-associated “A” to the HD on the fusion protein results in modification of the fusion protein at “X”. FIG. 2B is a related aspect of the invention in which a binding domain of a protein “A” containing an enzyme target site “T” interacts with a binding domain “B” of a fusion protein, which results in enzyme “E” modifying the reporter domain “R” of fusion protein “B” at modification site “X” such that the fusion protein does or does not emit light or cause light to be emitted.

FIG. 3 shows pVHL binding to a modified form of HIF. (A) shows pVHL-defective renal carcinoma cells treated with increasing amounts of desferoxamine (2, 10, 100, 1000 μm) or cobalt choloride (2, 10, 100, 1000 μm) and immunoprecipitated with control (lane 1) or anti-HIF2 antibody. Bound proteins were detected by anti-HIF2a immunoblot (IB) or by farwestern (FW) analysis with purified pVHL/elongin B/elongin C (VBC) complexes. (B) shows VBC farwestern and anti-HIF2α immunoblot analysis of ts20 cells grown at the restrictive temperature under hypoxic or normoxic conditions. (C and D) depict GST-HIF1α (530-652), containing the oxygen-dependent degradation domain (ODD), produced in E. Coli, recovered on glutathione Sepharose, and incubated with rabbit reticulocyte lysate for 90 min at 30° C. In (D, lane 3), the reticulocyte lysate was first heat inactivated for 20 min. Following stringent washes the GST-ODD protein was subjected to VBC farwestern and anti-GST immunoblot analysis.

FIG. 4 shows pVHL binding to a HIF1α-derived peptide if Leu562 and Pro564 are intact. (A) shows binding of the indicated ³⁵S-labeled Gal4-HIF1α fusion proteins to immobilized GST-pVHL, elongin B, elongin C complexes. (B) shows binding of ³⁵S-labeled pVHL to biotinylated HIF1α (556-575) peptides with the indicated substitutions of residues 561-568. ‘+’ indicates preincubation of peptide with unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate prior to addition of pVHL. (C and D) depict ³⁵S-labeled wild-type (WT), Pro564Ala, and Leu562Ala full-length HA-HIF1α (panel C) and Gal4-HA-HIF1α (530-652) (panel D) proteins immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody or captured with immobilized GST-VBC complexes. WG=wheat germ extract; Retic=rabbit reticulocyte lysate.

FIG. 5 shows ubiquitination and degradation of HIF linked to Leu562 and Pro 564. (A) depicts in vitro ubiquitination of ³⁵S-labeled wild-type, Leu562A, and Pro564A Gal4-HA-HIF1α (530-652) in the presence of S100 extracts prepared from pVHL-defective renal carcinoma cells stably transfected to produce wild-type pVHL or with empty vector. (B) shows in vitro degradation of ³⁵S-labeled wild-type, Leu562Ala, and Pro564Ala in xenopus egg extracts. (C) is an anti-HA immunoblot analysis of COS7 cells transiently transfected with 1.5 or 3.5 μg of plasmids encoding wild-type or P564A HA-HIF1α in the absence or presence of desferoxamine.

FIG. 6 depicts proline hydroxylation linked to pVHL-binding. (A) is a MALDI-TOF analysis of wild-type, Pro564Ala, and Leu562Ala biotinylated HIF (556-575) peptides following incubation with rabbit reticulocyte lysate. (B) shows Gal4-HA-HIF (555-575) translated in vitro in the presence of 3H-Proline with rabbit reticulocyte lysate or wheat germ extract and gel-band purified. Following acid hydrolysis proline and hydroxyproline were separated using thin layer chromatography. The dashed circle indicates positions of ninhydrin stained proline and hydroxyproline markers.

FIG. 7 illustrates that pVHL specifically recognizes HIF1α with hydroxylated proline 564. (A and B) shows binding of ³⁵S-labeled pVHL to biotinylated HIF1α (556-575) peptides with the indicated substitutions of residues 561-568. (C) shows ts20 cells stably transfected to produce HA-pVHL grown at restrictive (lane 1) or permissive (lanes 2-6) temperature and immunoprecipitated anti-HIF1α (lane 1 and 2) or anti-HA antibody (lanes 3-7). Bound proteins were eluted by boiling in sample buffer (lane 1 and 2) or treatment with the indicated peptides and then immunoblotted with anti-HIF1α antibody. (D) shows pVHL-defective renal carcinoma cells stably transfected to produce wild-type pVHL (WT8) or with empty vector (RC3) metabolically labeled with ³⁵S methionine, lysed, and incubated with immobilized biotinylated HIF1α (556-575) peptides with the indicated substitutions of residue 564. Specifically bound proteins were detected by autoradiography.

FIG. 8 illustrates the production of TETr-cyclins A and E. (A) is a schematic of TETr-cyclin fusion protein. (B) shows production of TETr-cyclin A and TETr-cyclin E. Cells transfected to produce the indicated cyclin A or cyclin E proteins were lysed and immunoblotted (IB) with the indicated antibodies. (C) shows phosphorylation of pRB by TETr-cyclins A and E in SAOS-2 cells. pRB-defective SAOS-2 cells transfected so as to produce HA-tagged pRB along with the indicated cyclins were lysed and immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody. The % of transfected cells in G1 and S phase was determined by fluororescence activated cell sorting (FACS).

FIG. 9 shows DNA bound cyclins A and E differentially affecting transcription. (A) is a schematic of reporter plasmid (pUHC 13-3) that contains seven TETracycline operator sequences (TETo) upstream of a minimal CMV promoter that includes a TATA box. (B, C) show U2OS cells were cotransfected with plasmids encoding the indicated TETr fusion proteins along with the pUHC 13-3 reporter plasmid and a plasmid encoding β-galactosidase. Numbers shown at the bottom of the graph indicate the amount of TETr plasmid (in μg). 48 hours later luciferase activity, normalized for β-galactosidase, was determined. Fold repression is the corrected luciferase value for TETr alone divided by the corrected luciferase values for the indicated TETr fusion proteins. Fold activation represents the corrected luciferase values for the indicated TETr fusion proteins divided by the corrected luciferase value for TETr alone.

FIG. 10 illustrates transcriptional regulation by cyclins A and E dependent upon DNA binding. (A) shows U2OS cells cotransfected with plasmids encoding the indicated TETr fusion proteins along with the pUHC 13-3 reporter plasmid and a plasmid encoding β-galactosidase. 24 hours later doxycycline was added to a final concentration of 2 μg/ml where indicated by a ‘+’. 24 hours later, luciferase activity, corrected for β-galactosidase activity, was determined and expressed as fold repression or activation relative to cells producing TETr alone. (B) shows U2OS cells cotransfected with plasmids encoding the indicated cyclins along with the pUHC 13-3 reporter plasmid and a plasmid encoding β-galactosidase. Fold repression and activation was determined as in (A). (C) shows U2OS cells cotransfected with plasmids encoding TETr or TETr-cyclin E, along with a minimal HSV-TK promoter reporter plasmid containing the indicated number of TETo binding sites and a plasmid encoding β-galactosidase. Doxycycline was added as in (A).

FIG. 11 illustrates that cyclin box is required for transcriptional repression by DNA bound cyclin A. (A) U2OS cells were cotransfected with plasmids encoding the indicated TETr-cyclin A variants along with the pUHC 13-3 reporter plasmid and a plasmid encoding β-galactosidase. Cell extracts were prepared and luciferase activity, corrected for β-galactosidase activity, was expressed as fold repression relative to cells producing TETr alone. (B) The indicated TETr-cyclin A variants were translated in vitro in the presence of ³⁵S-methionine and incubated with GST-cdk2 and glutathione Sepharose. Specifically bound proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and detected by autoradiography. In parallel, 20% of the input proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and detected by autoradiography. (c) pRB defective SAOS-2 cells transfected so as to produce HA-tagged pRB along with the indicated TETr-cyclin A variants were lysed and immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody.

FIG. 12 shows transcriptional activation by cyclin E linked to its ability to bind to cdk2 and interact with substrates. (A) U2OS cells were cotransfected with plasmids encoding the indicated TETr-cyclin E variants along with the pUHC 13-3 reporter plasmid and a plasmid encoding β-galactosidase. Cell extracts were prepared, and luciferase activity, corrected for β-galactosidase activity, was expressed as fold activation relative to cells producing TETr alone. (B) The indicated TETr-cyclin E variants were translated in vitro in the presence of ³⁵S-methionine and incubated with GST-cdk2 and glutathione Sepharose. Specifically bound proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and detected by autoradiography. In parallel, 20% of the input proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and detected by autoradiography. (c) pRB defective SAOS-2 cells transfected so as to produce HA-tagged pRB along with the indicated TETr-cyclin E variants were lysed and immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody.

FIG. 13 shows transcriptional activation by DNA bound cyclin E dependent on cdk2 catalytic activity. (A, B) U2OS cells were transiently cotransfected with plasmids encoding TETr-cyclin A or E and, where indicated, increasing amounts of a plasmid encoding a dominant-negative (dn) form of cdk2. Cell extracts were prepared and luciferase activity, corrected for β-galactosidase activity, was determined. Corrected luciferase values were expressed as fold repression (A) or activation (B) relative to TETr alone. (C) U2OS cells were transiently transfected with plasmids encoding TETr-cdk2 or TETr-cdk2 (N132A) and a plasmid encoding either cyclin A or E. Cell extracts were prepared and luciferase activity, corrected for β-galactosidase activity, was determined. Corrected luciferase values were expressed as fold activation relative to TETr alone.

FIG. 14 shows transcriptional effects mediated by cell-cycle dependent changes in endogenous cyclins E and A. (A,B) 3T3 cells stably transfected with a luciferase reporter plasmid containing 7 TETo sites (pUHC13-3) and a plasmid encoding TETr-cdk2 were serum-starved for 72 hours and subsequently re-fed with serum. At various timepoints thereafter aliquots of cells were removed and either lysed for immunoblot analysis with the indicated antibodies or analyzed for DNA content by propidium iodide staining followed by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). (C) 3T3 cells stably transfected with a luciferase reporter plasmid containing 7 TETo sites (pUHC13-3) in the absence (open circles) or presence of a plasmid encoding TETr-cdk2 (closed squares) or TETr-cdk2 (N132A) (open squares) were serum-starved for 72 hours and then re-fed with serum in the presence or absence of doxycycline. At various timepoints thereafter luciferase assays were performed. To correct for general effects due to serum, the luciferase values at each timepoint in the absence of doxycycline were corrected by subtracting the luciferase assay obtained in the presence of doxycycline. After correction, the luciferase values for the two cell populations were expressed relative to the corresponding luciferase values obtained at time 0. In parallel, the cells producing TETr-cdk2 were lysed and immunoprecipitated with anti-cyclin A or anti-cyclin E antibodies. The immunoprecipitates were then used to phosphorylate Histone H1 in vitro.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Characterization of Hypoxia-Responsive Polypeptides

In order to demonstrate the efficacy of the First embodiment of the invention, e.g. employing a hypoxia-responsive LGP, the interaction of pVHL and HIF was examined. A HIF1α polypeptide that is sufficient to bind pVHL is disclosed herein. pVHL binds directly to a region of HIF1α called the oxygen-dependent degradation domain (ODD). pVHL recognizes HIF produced in rabbit reticulocyte lysate but not HIF produced in wheat germ extracts or in E. Coli. Furthermore, wheat germ or E. Coli-derived HIF binds to pVHL following preincubation with a human, rabbit, or xenopus cell extracts at 37° C. For example, glutathione S-transferase-ODD fusion proteins produced in E. Coli were not recognized by VBC in farwestern assays (FIG. 3C). These proteins were recognized, however, after pre-incubation with a rabbit reticulocyte lysate. Similar results were obtained with GST-ODD fusion proteins of various sizes, thus excluding the possibility that the farwestern blot signal represents a spurious interaction between VBC and a reticulocyte-derived protein. VBC did not recognize GST-ODD fusion proteins incubated with a heat-inactivated reticulocyte lysate (FIG. 3D). Gal4-HIF fusion proteins containing HIF residues 555-575 bound specifically to immobilized GST-VHL, elongin B, elongin C complexes (FIG. 4A). Coupled in vitro transcription/translation of ³⁵S-labeled proteins was conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions (TNT, Promega). Also, a biotinylated peptide corresponding to HIF residues 556-575 bound to pVHL following pre-incubation with reticulocyte lysate (FIG. 4B). For peptide binding studies, 1 μg of biotinylated peptide was bound to 30 μl of monomeric avidin Sepharose (Pierce). Where indicated, the peptide was pre-incubated with 50 μl of rabbit reticulocyte lysate for 90 min at 30° C. The Sepharose was then washed 3 times with NETN (20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% non-idet P40) and used in binding reactions containing 4 μl ³⁵S-HA-pVHL in 500 μl of EBC or 500 μl ³⁵S-radiolabeled cell extract (equivalent to cells from a subconfluent 100 mm dish). Following 1 hour incubation at 4° C. with rocking the Sepharose was washed 4 times with NETN. Bound proteins were eluted by boiling in SDS-containing sample buffer and detected by autoradiography. This region of HIF contains a highly conserved 8 mer (MLAPYIPM) which, when mutated to 8 consecutive alanines, leads to HIF stabilization in cells. An alanine scan of this region showed that Leu562 and Pro564 were essential for specific binding to pVHL in this assay (FIG. 4B). In contrast, mutation of the one potential phosphoacceptor in this peptide, Tyr565, did not affect pVHL binding, in keeping with an earlier study in which a Tyr565Phe mutation did not affect HIF stability. In addition, the binding of pVHL to GST-ODD in the assays described above was unaffected by phosphatase treatment.

Binding of pVHL to HIF1α is critically dependent upon residues Leu562 or Pro564 of HIF1α. Importantly, mutation of either Leu562 or Pro564 in the context of full-length HIF1α or a Gal4-ODD fusion protein also led to a loss of pVHL binding activity (FIGS. 4C and 4D, respectively). Gal4-ODD made with reticulocyte lysate contained an electrophoretically distinct band compared with Gal4-ODD made with wheat germ extract (FIG. 4D). This electrophoretically distinct protein bound to VBC and was undetectable among the Leu562Ala and Pro564Ala translation products. The isoelectric points of the two arrowed bands in FIG. 4D were identical following 2-D gel electrophoresis indicating that the putative modification did not involve a change in protein charge.

Modification of HIF1α by pVHL following binding is also critically dependent upon residues Leu562 or Pro564 of HIF1α. Gal4-HIF fusion proteins with the Leu562Ala mutation or Pro564Ala mutation displayed diminished pVHL-dependent polyubiquitination in vitro relative to the corresponding wild-type protein (FIG. 5A). Qualitatively similar results were obtained with the corresponding full-length HIF1α species, although this assay is less robust than with the Gal4-ODD fusion proteins. Likewise, HIF1α Pro564Ala and HIF1α Leu562Ala were far more stable than wild-type HIF1α in in vitro degradation assays performed with xenopus extracts (FIG. 5B). Xenopus egg extracts were made as is well known in the art and stored frozen until use. Degradation reactions contained 8 μl of egg extract, 0.1 μl of 100 mg/ml cyclohexamide, 0.25 μl of energy regeneration mix, 0.25 μl of bovine ubiquitin, and 0.4 μl of ³⁵S-radiolabeled HIF and were carried out at room temperature. At the indicated timepoints 1 μl aliquots were removed and placed in sample buffer. Samples were resolved on 5-15% gradient gels and analyzed by autoradiography. Biotinylated HIF (556-575) peptides were incubated with rabbit reticulocyte lysate, washed, eluted with free biotin, and analyzed by mass spectrometry. 1 μg of HPLC-purified peptide was bound to 30 μl monomeric avidin Sepharose and incubated with 100 μl of rabbit reticulocyte lysate at room temperature for 1 hour with tumbling. Following brief centrifugation the reticulocyte lysate was removed, fresh reticulocyte lysate was added, and the cycle was repeated 6 times. The Sepharose was then washed 4 times with NETN and once with PBS. The modified peptide was eluted in 50 μl of 20 mM ammonium acetate [pH 7.0], 2 mM biotin. In these experiments Met561 and Met568 were converted to alanine to prevent spurious oxidation of the methionine residues during analysis. This double alanine substitution, like the corresponding single substitutions, did not affect pVHL binding. Treatment of the HIF (556-575) peptide with rabbit reticulocyte lysate led to the appearance of a second peak in MALDI-TOF assays representing an increase in molecular weight of 16 (FIG. 6A). This peak was not detectable prior to incubation with reticulocyte lysate and was not detected in the corresponding reticulocyte-treated Leu562Ala and Pro564Ala peptides (FIG. 6A). Postsource decay analysis using the same instrument placed the addition of +16 at Pro 564. Similarly, electrospray ion trap mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis was consistent with addition of +16 at Pro 564 and excluded such a modification of Leu 562. Finally, MS/MS analysis of the reticulocyte-treated HIF (556-575) peptide produced a pattern of ions that was identical to the pattern obtained with a HIF (556-575) peptide which was synthesized to contain hydroxyproline at position 564. Next, Gal4-HIF (555-575) was translated in vitro in the presence of ³H-Proline using rabbit reticulocyte lysate or wheat germ extract, gel-band purified, and subjected to acid hydrolysis and thin layer chromatography. 2 ml of ³H-P-labeled Gal4-HIF (555-575) in vitro translate was immunoprecipitated with 50 μg of anti-HA antibody (12CA5, Roche), resolved on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and transferred to a PVDF membrane. Gal4-HIF (555-575) was visualized by autoradiography and the corresponding region of PVDF was excised, hydrolyzed by incubation in 100 μl of 10 N HCl at 105° C. for 3 hours. Samples were evaporated to dryness, resuspended in 20 μl H₂O containing 10 μg of unlabeled proline and 4-OH proline (Sigma), and resolved by 2-D thin layer chromatography using phenol-distilled H₂O in the first dimension and N-butanol-acetic acid-H₂O in the second. Following visualization of standards with ninhydrin radiolabeled proline was detected by autoradiography. Gal4-HIF produced in rabbit reticulocyte lysate, but not in wheat germ, contained hydroxyproline (FIG. 6B).

pVHL specifically recognizes a proline hydroxylated determinant. The HIF (556-575) peptide containing hydroxyproline at position 564 bound to pVHL with or without pretreatment with reticulocyte lysate (FIG. 7A). The mass spectrometry analysis of the Leu562Ala peptide showed that Leu562 was required for HIF modification (FIG. 6A). Indeed, pVHL bound to a HIF (556-575) peptide with the Leu562Ala substition and hydroxyproline at residue 564 (FIG. 7B). This suggests that the primary role of Leu562 is to allow for the hydroxylation of Pro 564. Two approaches were used to demonstrate that hydroxylated HIF peptide could interact with cell-derived pVHL complexes. Ts20 cells were engineered to produce HA-tagged pVHL which carry a temperature-sensitive mutation in the E1-ubiquitin activating enzyme. ts20 cells were transfected with pIRES-HA-VHL, pIRES-HA-VHL (Y98H), or pIRES-Neo (Invitrogen) and selected in the presence of 1 mg/ml G418. Individual G418-resistant colonies were isolated using cloning cylinders and expanded. Cells producing HA-VHL or HA-VHL (Y98H) were identified by anti-HA immunoblot analysis. HIF coimmunoprecipitated with HA-pVHL at the restrictive temperature. HIF bound to pVHL in this way could be eluted by the hydroxylated HIF (556-575) peptide but not the unmodified peptide (FIG. 7C). For the tests shown in FIG. 5C, ts20 cells were grown at the restrictive or permissive temperature for 14 hours, methionine-starved for 90 min, and then grown in the methionine-free media supplemented with ³⁵S-met (500 mCi/ml) for 90 min. Cells were washed once with cold PBS, lysed in EBC, and immunoprecipitated with anti-HA (12CA5; Roche or anti-HIF1α (NB100-105; Novus). Following 5 washes with NETN bound proteins were eluted by boiling in sample buffer or by incubation in 65 μl of PBS containing 7 μg of the indicated peptide. Moreover, HIF was not eluted by the HIF (556-575) Pro564Ala peptide or by a poly-hydroxyproline peptide (FIG. 7C). Affinity chromatography was performed with immobilized peptides and metabolically labeled matched renal carcinoma cells which do (WT8) or do not (RC3) produce HA-pVHL. 786-O subclones were starved for 1 hour, grown in the methionine-free media supplemented with ³⁵S-met (500 mCi/ml) for 3 hr, washed once with ice cold PBS, and lysed in EBC. The proline hydroxylated HIF (556-575) peptide specifically bound to pVHL as well as proteins with the expected electrophoretic mobilities of the pVHL-associated proteins elongin B, elongin C, and Cul2 (FIG. 7D). The identity of pVHL in this experiment was confirmed by western blot analysis. Likewise, the binding of endogenous pVHL to the hydroxylated peptide was detected using 293 embryonic kidney cells. A HIF1α mutant in which Proline 564 was converted to alanine was stabilized in cells and insensitive to the hypoxia-mimetic desferoxamine (FIG. 5C).

The HIF1α protein is stabilized in hypoxic conditions and functions to inhibit, decrease and/or reverse hypoxia in affected tissues, e.g. in a solid tumor, diabetic retinopathy or ischemic heart tissue, in part by modulating pro-angiogenic factors. A light-generating fusion protein containing a HIF1α moiety will also be stabilized in hypoxic tissue. Destruction of a HIF1α protein or a HIF1α-containing LGP via the pVHL ubiquitin pathway occurs, e.g. during normoxia, when a prolyl hydroxylase modifies the HIF1α protein such that pVHL binds to and modifies HIF1α. This modification process acts as a dynamic switch to regulate the bioluminescence of the HIF1α-containing light-generating fusion protein such as the First embodiment of the invention. A HIF1α-containing light-generating fusion protein is useful to dynamically image hypoxic tissues, e.g. cancer, in situ, and to screen for or test the efficacy of hypoxia-modulating compounds.

Example 2

The following example demonstrates the efficacy of light-generating fusion proteins of the invention for imaging hypoxic tissues.

The Oxygen-Dependent Degradation Domain (ODD) of HIF1α, renders HIF1α unstable in the presence of oxygen. This region is recognized by pVHL. pVHL specifically binds directly to peptidic determinants, corresponding to HIF1α residues 555-575, located within the ODD. At the core of this peptide there is a conserved proline residue (residue 564) which, in the presence of oxygen, becomes enzymatically hydroxylated. This residue serves as the signal for pVHL to bind. In sum, in the presence of oxygen, the HIF peptide becomes hydroxylated and is recognized by pVHL. In the absence of oxygen (hypoxia), the modification does not take place and pVHL does not bind to HIF.

Construction of ODD-LUC Plasmids

In a first set of experiments the ability of a small HIF peptide (555-575) to function in cis to target a foreign protein for pVHL-dependent proteolysis was evaluated. To this end, the HIF cDNA encoding amino acids 555-575 (hereafter ‘ODD’) was PCR amplified with oligonucleotides that introduced convenient restriction sites, digested, and gel-band purified. The PCR fragment was then subcloned, in-frame, 3′ of a Firefly luciferase cDNA contained in the pGL3 plasmid (Promega). The resulting luciferase-ODD chimeric cDNA was subcloned into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen) to facilitate in vitro translation and expression studies in mammalian cells. In parallel a pcDNA3 plasmid encoding wild-type Firefly luciferase and pcDNA3 plasmid encoding wild-type HIF1α was used as controls.

VBC-GST Pulldown of ODD-Luciferase

To determine whether the ODD-luciferase protein could bind to pVHL, GST-VHL, elongin B, and elongin C (‘GST-VBC’) were produced in E. Coli and recovered as a trimeric complex on glutathione sepharose. Earlier work showed that pVHL does not fold properly in the absence of elongin B and elongin C. HIF1α, ODD-luciferase, and wild-type luciferase were translated in vitro using rabbit reticulocyte lysate (RRL) or wheat germ extract (WG) in the presence of ³⁵S methionine (FIG. 15). Aliquots from the in vitro translation reactions were added to recombinant VBC-GST prebound to glutathione sepharose and incubated for 1 hour. The sepharose was then washed and bound proteins were resolved on a 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel. The gel was then dried and exposed to film. pVHL bound to reticulocyte-generated HIF1α and ODD-Luc, but not Luc (compare lanes 4, 8 and, 12). Furthermore, pVHL did not bind to wheat germ produced ODD-Luc, as wheat germ lacks the HIF prolyl hydroxylase (compare lanes 6 and 8). Thus the data show that ODD-Luc was specifically recognized by pVHL.

Peptide Competition Assay

The observation that pVHL bound to ODD-Luc produced in RRL, but not WG, strongly suggested that the ODD-Luc, like HIF, needed to undergo prolyl hydroxylation in order to be recognized by pVHL. To study this further, the GST-VBC binding experiments were repeated in the presence of synthetic HIF (555-575) peptides in which Pro 564 was hydroxylated (P—OH) or was not hydroxylated (P). GST-VBC was mixed with either the control (P) peptide or the P—OH peptide in increasing concentrations (from 0-5 μg). Next in vitro translated (in retic lysate) Luc, ODD-Luc, or HIF1α was then added. The OH peptide specifically blocked the binding of HIF and ODD-Luc to pVHL. Thus, the results obtained with ODD-Luc recapitulated earlier binding studies performed with authentic HIF. (FIG. 16.)

Luciferase Activity in Cells

In pilot experiments, it was confirmed that ODD-Luc in vitro translate retained luciferase activity in vitro comparable to wild-type luciferase. To begin to ask whether the ODD-Luc was oxygen sensitive in cells, transient transfection assays were performed. In the first set of experiments, 100 mm tissue culture plates were seeded with 8×10⁵ HeLa cells per plate. Eighteen hours later the cells were transiently transfected, using lipofectamine (Gibco), with the pcDNA3 plasmids encoding ODD-Luc or wild-type Luc along with an internal control plasmid encoding Renilla luciferase. Twenty-four hours after transfection the cells were split into 6 well plates and allowed to adhere and grow for 8-12 hours. At this point the hypoxia mimetics desferrioxamine (DFO) or cobalt chloride (CoCl2) were added directly to the media at final concentrations of 500 μM and 200 μM respectively, in duplicate wells. In addition, some wells were not treated so as to serve as controls. 12 hours after treatment with DFO and CoCl2 the cells were lysed with Passive Lysis Buffer (Promega), rocked at room temperature for 20 minutes, and assayed for Firefly and Renilla Luciferase according to the manufacturers instructions. Results were obtained in duplicate and averaged. (FIG. 17). Luciferase activity in HeLa cells containing pcDNA3 plasmids encoding wild-type Luc are presented in the first three bars from the left; while luciferase activity in HeLa cells containing pcDNA3 plasmids encoding ODD-Luc are presented in the fourth through sixth bars from the left.

In the untreated cells the luciferase values for ODD-Luc were approximately 30% of the values obtained with wild-type Luc. Note that HeLa cells have wild-type pVHL and these experiments were conducted using cells grown in the presence of oxygen. The addition of hypoxia-mimetics led to a marked increased in ODD-Luc luciferase activity, whereas no such induction was detected with wild-type luciferase. The induced levels of ODD-luciferase were comparable to those obtained with wild-type luciferase. These results are consistent with the idea that ODD-Luc is subject to pVHL-dependent proteolysis in cells whereas wild-type Luc is not.

Imaging of ODD-Luc in Xenograft Tumors in Nude Mice.

To verify in a mammalian system that the ODD-Luc gene is indeed regulated by hypoxia or hypoxia-mimetics, the following experiment was conducted. Given the ease of subcutaneously transplanting tumors and their ability to grow and vascularize, the ability to image luciferase activity of tumors at the subcutaneous level and assess ODD-Luc's response to hypoxia was tested as follows.

Polyclonal Hela cells stably transfected with ODD-Luc and Luc were generated. The clones were suspended in PBS and counted. 10⁶ cells per injection site were administered subcutaneously in duplicate into the flanks of nude mice (FIG. 18). Upon growth of palpable tumors (approximately 3-4 days) the mice were given intraperitoneal injections of phenobarbital for anesthesia, injected with a weight-adjusted dose of luciferin, and whole body imaged with a Xenogen Camera. To ensure that the difference in luciferase activity was not simply a function of tumor size alone, bidimensional tumor measurements were taken and were approximately equal.

FIG. 18 shows three different mice injected with ODD-Luc (right) and Luc (left) in duplicate. The sites where ODD-Luc was injected clearly have attenuated luciferase signal. As such, the data show a real attenuation of luciferase activity, secondary ubiquitination and destruction of ODD-Luc.

Example 3 Light-Generating Fusion Proteins Including a DNA Binding Site

In order to demonstrate the efficacy of the Second embodiment of the invention, a LGP capable of interacting with nucleic acids in order to kinetically monitor gene transcription in vivo, in vitro or in silico, the impact of cyclins on transcription was examined. As it is useful to monitor either the induction or repression of transcription, cyclins with specific affects on transcription were investigated.

The kinase Cdk2, when bound to either cyclin E or cyclin A can direct the phosphorylation of its substrates. (FIG. 20.) Mammalian expression plasmids were made encoding fusion proteins consisting of the tet repressor DNA binding domain (TetR) fused to either cdk2, cyclin E or cyclin A. It was found that TetR-cdk2, as well as TetR-cyclin E, will activate transcription when tested against a luciferase reporter plasmid containing TetR DNA binding sites (TetO) upstream of a minimal promoter. Furthermore, we showed that this activation depends on the ability of cyclin E/cdk2 to act as a kinase. As luciferase can be monitored non-invasively, this discovery provides a means to monior cdk2 activity in vivo. For example, tumor cells could stably be transfected to produce TetR-cdk2 or TetR-cyclin E along with a suitable teto reporter plasmid. The cells could then be grown in vitro or in vivo (such as ectopically or orthotopically in nude mice) and luciferase activity could be monitored with a suitable camera following systemic administration of luciferin. In another embodiment, viral or non-viral vector systems could be developed that direct the expression of TetR-cdk2 (or TetR-cyclin E) along with a TetO-driven reporter gene. The vector could then be used to introduce the TetR-fusion and TetO-reporter genes into cells or tissues to be interrogated.

The invention could be used to generate cells, tissues, or animals in which the activity of a reporter was dependent upon cyclin/cdk2 activity. As outlined above, this approach can likely be generalized to other enzymatic activities. This invention should greatly facilitate pharmacodynamic studies. For example, mice bearing tumor xenografts in which luciferase activity was dependent upon cyclin/cdk2 activity could be used to assess the bioavailability and efficacy of cdk2 inhibitors in vivo. As highly proliferative cells, including cancer cells, have high levels of cyclin/cdk2 activity, one might also use this invention in a diagnostic setting.

Fusion of a DNA-binding motif to a cyclin does not alter cyclin binding to a cdk or the kinase activity of the cyclin/cdk complex. Mammalian expression plasmids were generated that encode fusion proteins consisting of the TET repressor DNA-binding domain (TETr) (Gossen and Bujard, 1992) fused to cyclin A or cyclin E with an intervening flexible linker consisting of Gly₄-Ser repeats (FIG. 8A). Both of these plasmids gave rise to stable proteins of the expected size following transfection into mammalian cells (FIG. 8B). TETr-cyclin A and TETr-cyclin E, like their unfused counterparts, bound to cdk2 (FIGS. 11 and 12) and could phosphorylate p107 in vitro. Furthermore, both TETr-cyclin A and TETr-cyclin E promoted pRB phosphorylation and bypassed a pRB-induced G1/S block when cointroduced with wild-type pRB into pRB-defective tumor cells (FIG. 8C).

Cyclin A and cyclin E dramatically affect transcription. U2OS cells were transiently transfected with plasmids encoding various TETr fusion proteins and a luciferase reporter plasmid containing 7 TETo binding sites upstream of a TATA box derived from the CMV promoter (FIG. 9A). TETr binds specifically to TETo sites. As expected, TETr-RB repressed transcription from this reporter plasmid whereas TETr-E2F1 activated the reporter (FIGS. 9B-C). The basal activity observed with this reporter plasmid presumably reflects the presence of cryptic enhancer sequences. In this and subsequent assays, the TETr domain alone was essentially inert. Surprisingly, TETr-cyclin A and TETr-cyclin E both dramatically affected transcription in this assay and did so in opposite ways. TETr-cyclin A decreased transcription approximately 80% (5-fold repression) whereas TETr-cyclin E increased transcription 10-fold (FIGS. 9B-C). Doxycycline prevents the binding of TETr to TETo and completely blocked the transcriptional effects of TETr-cyclin A and TETr-cyclin E (FIG. 10A). As expected, doxycycline also blocked the transcriptional effects of TETr-RB and TETr-E2F1, which were tested in parallel. Furthermore, unfused cyclin A and E had no effects on the TETo-driven reporter plasmid (FIG. 10B). Experiments were repeated using reporters containing 1, 2, 3, or 7 TETo in which the CMV-derived TATA box was replaced with a minimal HSV TK promoter (Gossen and Bujard, 1992) (FIG. 10C). TETr-cyclin E also activated these reporters in doxycycline-inhibitable manner. The degree of activation observed with the HSV TK series of reporters was lower than with the CMV TATA-based reporter, in keeping with earlier results obtained with these reporters and fused TETr to the HSV VP 16 transcriptional activation domain (Gossen and Bujard). The low basal level of transcription from these reporters precluded analysis of repression by cyclin A.

The specific domains of the cyclins that bind to the cdks are critical for cyclin-mediated transcriptional regulation. Plasmids encoding TETr fused to various colinear fragments of cyclin A and E were used to determine which regions of these molecules are required for transcriptional regulation (FIGS. 11 and 12). All of the resulting fusion proteins were expressed at comparable levels in transient transfection experiments. Cyclin A (1-310), like wild-type cyclin A, repressed transcription when fused to TETr (FIG. 11A). This fragment of cyclin A does not bind to cdk2 (FIG. 11B) and cannot direct the phosphorylation of pRB when introduced into cells (FIG. 11C). Conversely, a cyclin A point mutant (E220A) (Schulman et al., 1998) that measurably interacts with cdk2 (FIG. 11B) and directs the phosphorylation of pRB (FIG. 11C) did not repress transcription in these assays (FIG. 11A). This mutation maps to the cyclin A cyclin box (FIG. 11A). TETr-cyclin A also repressed transcription when tested in p107 −/−;p130 −/− mouse fibroblasts and cyclin A (1-310) does not bind to either p107 or p130. Only those cyclin E mutants that bind to cdk2 (FIG. 12B) and could direct the phosphorylation of pRB (FIG. 12C) scored as transcriptional activators (FIG. 12A). For example, Schulman et al (1998) identified cyclin A residues that are critical for substrate binding and assembly with cdk2. Mutation of analogous residues in cyclin E produced a mutant (cyclin E L134A/Q174A) that likewise failed to bind to cdk2 (FIG. 12B) and failed to phosphorylate pRB (FIG. 12C). This mutant did not activate transcription (FIG. 12). In keeping with these results, a dominant-negative form of cdk2 blocked transcriptional activation by cyclin E (FIG. 13B) but had no effect on transcriptional repression by cyclin A (FIG. 13A). Similarly, cyclin E, but not cyclin A, activated transcription in concert with a TETr-cdk2 fusion provided the kinase domain was intact (FIG. 13C). Comparable production of TETr-cdk2 and kinase-defective TETr-cdk2 (N132A) was confirmed by immunoblot assay. Xenopus cyclin E (Jackson et al., 1995), like its human counterpart, also activated transcription in these assays (data not shown). This activity was specific as xenopus cyclin E variants with point mutations affecting the cyclin box were inert.

The Second embodiment of the invention is useful to dynamically image transcription in vivo. For example, cyclin E can activate transcription under physiological conditions. 3T3 cells were transfected with the plasmid containing a selectable marker and TETo reporter plasmid with or without a plasmid encoding TETr-cdk2. Following drug selection, the stable transfectants were maintained as polyclonal pools and serum starved into quiescence. At various timepoints after serum refeeding, cell lysates were prepared and used in immunoblot, in vitro kinase, and luciferase assays (FIG. 14). In parallel, aliquots of the cells were analyzed for DNA content by FACS. In this system, S-phase entry began 18-20 hours following the addition of serum. As expected, luciferase activity increased in the TETr-cdk2 producing cells coincident with an increase in cyclin E protein levels and cyclin E-associated kinase activity (FIGS. 14A-C). No such increase was observed in the cells producing equivalent amounts of TETr-cdk2 (N132A) or transfected with the reporter alone (FIG. 14C and data not shown). Note that the amount of TETr-cdk2 in these cells was less than the amount of endogenous cdk2 (FIG. 14B). Thus, the results are unlikely to be an artifact of overproduction. Luciferase values declined as cyclin E levels fell and cyclin A levels began to rise.

The Second embodiment of the invention in part relates to LGPs containing cyclin-binding domains. Thus, these LGPs are useful to dynamically quantify alterations in transcription of cell-cycle associated genes, such as oncogenes and tumor suppressors. A LGP containing a cyclin-binding moiety can be localized to regions undergoing cell proliferation, such as a tumor, and can be used to screen for and determine the efficacy of cell proliferation-modulating compounds.

Materials and Methods

Cell Lines and Transfection

U2OS human osteosarcoma cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle media (DMEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetalclone (Hyclone) (FC), 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine (PSG). SAOS-2 human osteosarcoma cells and NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblast cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and PSG. NIH 3T3 stable subclones transfected with the pCMV-neo and pUHC13-3 reporter plasmid alone or with pSG5-TETr-cdk2 or with pSG5-TETr-cdk2 (N132A) were maintained in 0.7 mg/ml of G418. Cells were transfected using 2× Bes-buffered saline (2×BBS)/calcium phosphate as described (Chen and Okayama, 1987). Where indicated doxycycline (Sigma) was added 24 hours after transfection to a final concentration of 2 μg/ml. Cells were maintained in doxycycline for an additional 24 hours prior to harvest.

Plasmids

pRcCMV-cdk2 dominant negative (van den Heuvel and Harlow, 1993) was a gift of Dr. Ed Harlow; pVL1393-cdk2 (N132A) (Xu et al., 1994) was a gift of Dr. Helen Piwnica-Worms; pCD19 (Tedder and Isaacs, 1989) was a gift of Dr. Thomas Tedder and pUHC13-3; ptet1-T81-luc, ptet2T81-luc, ptet3-T81-luc, and ptet7-T81-luc (Gossen and Bujard, 1992) were gifts of Dr. Manfred Gossen. pSG5-TETr-E2F1, pSG5-TETr-RB, pSG5-HA-RB (Sellers, 1995), pGEX-2TK-cdk2 (Adams et al, 1996) have been described previously. To make pSG5-TETr-cyclin A, a protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) cDNA was first PCR amplified with oligos 5′-GCGCTGATCAGGCGGAGGCGGATCAGGAGGAGGAGGATCAGGCGGAGGAGGATCAG GATCCATGTCCGACAGCGAGAA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 7) and 5′-GCGCGAATTCATTTCTTGGCTTTGGCAGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 8). The PCR product was cut with BclI and EcoRI and subcloned into pSG5-TETr cut with BamHI and EcoRI to make pSG5-TETr-(Gly₄-Ser)₃-PP1. The cyclin A open reading frame (ORF) was PCR amplified with primers that introduced a 5′ BamHI site and a 3′ EcoRI site and subcloned into pSP72 (Promega) cut with these two enzymes to make pSP72-cyclin A. The PP1 ‘stuffer’ from pSG5-TETr-(Gly₄-Ser)₃-PP1 was then excised by digestion with BamHI and EcoRI and replaced with the cyclin A cDNA insert from pSP72-cyclin A. To make pSG5-TETr-cyclin E, the cyclin E ORF in pRcCMV-cyclin E was PCR amplified with primers that introduced a 5′ BglII and 3′ EcoRI site. The PCR product was cut with these two enzymes and ligated into the BamHI-EcoRI backbone of pSG5-TETr-PP1. In parallel, these restricted cyclin A and cyclin E PCR products were subcloned into pSG5-HA cut with BamHI and EcoRI to make pSG5-HA-cyclin A and pSG5-HA-cyclin E, respectively. Plasmids encoding cyclin A and cyclin E N-terminal and C-terminal deletion mutants were made in an analogous fashion by using PCR primers that selectively amplified the desired coding regions. To make pSG5-TETr-cdk2 and pSG5-TETr-cdk2 (N132A), the cdk2 ORF in pRcCMV-cdk2 and pVL1393-cdk2 (N132A), respectively, were PCR amplified with primers that introduced a 5′ BamHI and 3′ EcoRI site. The PCR products were cut with these two enzymes and ligated into the BamHI-EcoRI backbone of pSG5-TETr-PP1. All PCR reactions were performed with Pfu DNA polymerase and the authenticity of plasmids containing the entire cyclin A, cyclin E, or cdk2 open reading frame was confirmed by direct DNA sequencing. pSG5-TETr-cyclin A (E220A) and pSG5-TETr-cyclin E (L134A/Q174A) were generated using Transformer Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Clontech) according to manufacture's instructions using pSG5-TETr-cyclin A and pSG5-TETr-cyclin E as a template, respectively, and confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Antibodies and Immunoblot Analysis

Monoclonal anti-TETr was purchased from Clontech and anti-HA (12CA5) was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim. Polyclonal anti-cyclin A (SC-751), monoclonal and polyclonal anticyclin E (SC-247, SC-481), and polyclonal anti-cdk2 (SC-163) were purchased from Santa Cruz. Cell extracts were made by lysis in EBC buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 8], 120 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40). For immunoblot analysis, ˜100 μg of cell extract was loaded per lane. Nitrocellulose filters were blocked in 4% powdered milk/1% goat serum in TBS-T (10mM Tris [pH 8], 0.05% Tween, 150 mM NaCl) for 1 hour at room temperature prior to incubation in primary antibody. Anti-HA (12CA5) was used at a concentration of 1.0 μg/ml, anti-TETr antibody at 1:500 dilution (v/v), anticyclin A (SC-751) at 1:1,000 dilution (v/v), anti-cyclin E (SC-247, SC-481) at 1:1,000 dilution (v/v) and anti-cdk2 (SC-163) at 1:1,000 dilution (v/v). Following 4 washes with TBS/T, bound antibody was detected using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies.

GST Pull-Down Assay

Glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays were performed basically as described previously (Kaelin et al., 1991). Binding reactions contained 10 μl of ³⁵S-radiolabelled in vitro translates made with a TNT kit (Promega) and approximately 1 μg of the indicated GST fusion protein in 1 ml of NETN (20 mM Tris [pH 8], 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40). Following 1 hour incubation at 4° C. with rocking, the Sepharose was washed 5 times with NETN. Bound proteins were eluted by boiling in SDS-containing sample buffer and resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Comparable loading of GST-fusion proteins was confirmed by Coomassie brilliant blue staining and ³⁵S-radiolabelled proteins were detected by fluorography.

FACS/Cell Cycle Analysis

Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) was done essentially as described (Qin et al., 1995). Briefly, subconfluent SAOS-2 cells grown in 100 mm dishes were transfected with 2 μg of pCD19 and 10 μg of pSG5-HA-RB together with plasmids encoding the indicated cyclins. 72 hr later the cells were harvested with trypsin-EDTA and stained with FITC-conjugated anti-CD19 antibody (CALTAG) and propiodium iodide. Samples were analyzed by two-color FACS with a FACScan (Becton Dickinson). For cell cycle synchronization, cells were starved in serum-free DMEM for 72 hours before being stimulated with 10% FBS.

Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay

For TETr-fusion transcriptional assay, subconfluent U2OS cells were transiently transfected in 6-well plates in duplicate with 1 μg of pCMV-μgal, 1 μg of pUHC13-3 reporter plasmid, and 3 μg of the indicated plasmids encoding TETr-fusion proteins. Sufficient parental pSG5-TETr was added so that each reaction mix contained the same amount of pSG5-TETr backbone. 48 hours after transfection luciferase activity and β-galactosidase activity was determined as described previously (Qin, 1995).

In Vitro Kinase Assay

500 μg of cell extract was incubated with protein A Sepharose and 1 μg of anti-cyclin E (SC-481) or anti-cyclin A (SC-751) antibody for 1 hour at 4° C. in a final volume of 0.5 ml. The Sepharose was then washed 5 times with NETN and 3 times in IP kinase (IPK) buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 10 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM DTT). The Sepharose was then resuspended in 27 μl of IPK buffer to which was added 2 μl of histone H1 (1 mg/ml) and 1 μl of [γ-³²P] ATP (6,000 Ci/mmol, 10 mCi/ml) and incubated for 30 min at 30° C. Reactions were stopped by addition of Laemmli sample buffer, boiled, resolved by SDS-polyacrylamidel gel electrophoresis, and subjected to autoradiography.

Example 4

The following example demonstrates the use of a particular light-generating fusion protein, containing a cyclin binding site (‘T’) that interacts with cyclin/cdk2 complexes. This LGP of the invention may be used for imaging hypoxic conditions.

The p27 protein contains a cyclin binding site (‘T’) that interacts with cyclin/cdk2 complexes. This allows cyclin/cdk2 to phosphorylate p27 at threonine 187 (‘X’), which targets p27 for ubiquitination by a ubiquitin ligase containing Skp2. To make a cyclin-binding LGP, p27 was fused in-frame to luciferase (p27-LUC). The resulting fusion protein was activated, as illustrated in FIG. 21, in the presence of the cdk2 inhibitor p21, but not by the cdk2 activator cyclin E.

Methods:

Plasmid Construction

To make pGL3-p27-LUC, full-length p27 was amplified by PCR with primers 5′-GCGCaagcttatgtcaaacgtgcgagtgtctaac-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 10) and 5′-gcgcccatggtcgtttgacgtcttctgaggccagg-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 11). The PCR product was digested with Hind III and Nco I, and the fragment was ligated into pGL3-control vector (Promega) cut with the same restriction enzymes.

Luciferase Assay

2×10⁵ Hela cells were seeded in 6 well plates 24 hrs prior to transfection. The cells were co-transfected with 0.1 μg plasmid DNA encoding wild-type firefly luciferase or p27-LUC, with or without 0.1-0.4 μg pCDNA3-HAp21 or pRcCMV-cyclinE plasmids (as indicated by the triangles), along with and 5 ng plasmid encoding Renilla-luciferase. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were lysed and 10 μl were used for the luciferase assay using the dual luciferase kit (Promega). The relative luciferase assay (RLU) was corrected by Renilla-luciferase activities.

REFERENCES

-   1. G. Semenza, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15, 551-578 (1999). -   2. R. Wenger, J Exper Biol 203, 1253-1263 (2000). -   3. G. Semenza, Cell 98, 281-4 (1999). -   4. H. Zhu, F. Bunn, Resp. Phys. 115, 239-247 (1999). -   5. M. Ivan, W. G. Kaelin, Current Opinion in Gen and Dev In Press     (2000). -   6. E. Maher, W. G. Kaelin, Medicine 76, 381-91 (1997). -   7. M. Tyers, R. Rottapel, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA Oct. 26, 1999;     96(22):12230-2 96, 12230-2 (1999). -   8. W. Krek, Nat Cell Biol 2000 July; 2(7):E121-3 2, E121-3 (2000). -   9. C. E. Stebbins, W. G. Kaelin, N. P. Pavletich, Science 284,     455-461 (1999). -   10. M. Ohh, et al., Nature Cell Biology 2, 423-427 (2000). -   11. T. Kamura, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 97, 10430-10435     (2000). -   12. M. Cockman, et al., J Biol Chem 275, 25733-41 (2000). -   13. K. Tanimoto, Y. Makino, T. Pereira, L. Poellinger, EMBO J 19,     4298-4309 (2000). -   14. P. Maxwell, et al., Nature 399, 271-5 (1999). -   15. M. A. Goldberg, S. P. Dunning, H. F. Bunn, Science 242,     1412-1415 (1988). -   16. G. Wang, G. Semenza, Blood 82, 3610-5 (1993). -   17. V. Ho, H. Bunn, Biochem Biophys Res Commun Jun. 5, 1996;     223(1):175-80 223, 175-80 (1996). -   18. D. Chowdary, J. Dermody, K. Jha, H. Ozer, Mol Cell Biol 14,     1997-2003 (1994). -   19. L. E. Huang, J. Gu, M. Schau, H. F. Bunn, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S     A 95, 7987-92 (1998). -   20. C. Pugh, J. O'Rourke, M. Nagao, J. Gleadle, P. Ratcliffe, J Biol     Chem 272, 11205-14 (1997). -   21. V. Srinivas, L. Zhang, X. Zhu, J. Caro, Biochem Biophys Res     Commun 260, 557-61 (1999). -   22. K. I. Kivirikko, J. Myllyharju, Matrix Biology 16, 357-368     (1998). -   23. A. Winter, A. Page, Mol Cell Biol 20, 4084-4093 (2000). -   24. L. Friedman, et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97, 4736-41     (2000). -   25. O. Iliopoulos, A. Kibel, S. Gray, W. G. Kaelin, Nature Medicine     1, 822-826 (1995). -   26. R. Deshaies, Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 15, 435-67 (1999). -   27. Y. Takahashi, S. Takahashi, Y. Shiga, T. Yoshimi, T. Miura, J     Biol Chem 275, 14139-46 (2000). -   28. C. Levene, C. Bates, Biochim Biophys Acta 444, 446-52 (1976). -   29. L. Huang, W. Willmore, J. Gu, M. Goldberg, H. Bunn, J Biol Chem     274, 9038-44 (1999). -   30. Y. Liu, et al., J Biol Chem 273, 15257-62 (1998). -   31. T. Morita, S. Kourembanas, J Clin Invest 96, 2676-82 (1995). -   32. C. Sutter, E. Laughner, G. Semenza, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97,     4748-53 (2000). -   33. G. Wang, B. Jiang, G. Semenza, Biochem Biophys Res Commun Nov.     13, 1995; 216(2):669-75 216, 669-75 (1995). -   34. K. Sogawa, et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Jun. 23, 1998;     95(13):7368-73 95, 7368-73 (1998). -   35. S. Salceda, I. Beck, V. Srinivas, J. Caro, Kidney Int 1997     February; 51(2):556-9 51, 556-9 (1997). -   36. J. Wingrove, P. O'Farrell, Cell Jul. 9, 1999; 98(1):105-14 98,     105-14 (1999). -   37. L. Palmer, G. Semenza, M. Stoler, R. Johns, Am J Physiol 274,     L212-9 (1998). -   38. G. Melillo, et al., J Exp Med Dec. 1, 1995; 182(6):1683-93 182,     1683-93 (1995). -   39. M. Bickel, et al., Hepatology 28, 404-11 (1998). -   40. T. Franklin, W. Morris, P. Edwards, M. Large, R. Stephenson,     Biochem J 353, 333-338 (2001). -   41. Adams, P. D., Sellers, W. R., Sharma, S. K., Wu, A. D.,     Nalin, C. M. and Kaelin, W. G. (1996) Identification of a     Cyclin-cdk2 recognition motif present in substrates and p21-like cdk     inhibitors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6623-6633 -   42. Adams, P. D., Li, X., Sellers, W. R., Baker, K. B., Leng, X.,     Harper, J. W., Taya, Y. and Kaelin, W. G. (1999) The retinoblastoma     protein contains a C-terminal motif that targets it for     phosphorylation by cyclin/cdk complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19,     1068-1080 -   43. Akoulitchev, S., Chuikov, S., Reinberg, D. (2000) TFIIH is     negatively regulated by cdk8-containing mediator complexes. Nature,     407, 102-6 -   44. Bagby, S., Kim, S., Maldonado, E., Tong, K. I., Reinberg, D. and     Ikura, M. (1995) Solution structure of the C-terminal core domain of     human TFIIB: similarity to cyclin A and interaction with     TATA-binding protein. Cell 82, 857-867 -   45. Bandara, L. R., Adamczewski, J. P., Hunt, T. and La     Thangue, N. B. (1991) Cyclin A and the retinoblastoma gene product     complex with a common transcription factor. Nature 352, 249-251 -   46. Beijersbergen, R. L., Carlee, L., Kerkhoven, R. M. and     Bernards, R. (1995) Regulation of the retinoblastoma protein-related     p107 by G1 cyclin complexes. Genes Dev. 9, 1340-1353 -   47. Bieniasz, P. D., Grdina, T. A., Bogerd, H. P. and     Cullen, B. R. (1999) Recruitment of cyclin T1/P-TEFb to an HIV type     1 long terminal repeat promoter proximal RNA target is both     necessary and sufficient for full activation of transcription. Proc.     Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 7791-7796 -   48. Bochar, D. A., Pan, Z. Q., Knights, R., Fisher, R. P.,     Shilatifard, A. and Shiekhattar, R. (1999) Inhibition of     transcription by the trimeric cyclin-dependent kinase 7 complex.     Biol. Chem. 274, 13162-13166 -   49. Chen, C. and Okayama, H. (1987) High-efficiency transformation     of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2745-2752 -   50. Chen, J., Saha, P., Kombluth, S., Dynlacht, B. D. and     Dutta, A. (1996) Cyclin-binding motifs are essential for the     function of p21CIP1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4673-4682 -   51. Dahmus, M. E. (1996) Reversible phosphorylation of the     C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. J. Biol. Chem. 271,     19009-19012 -   52. Devoto, S. H., Mudryj, M., Pines, J., Hunter, T. and     Nevins, J. R. (1992) A cyclin A protein kinase complex possesses     sequence specific DNA binding activity; p33cdk2 is a component of     the E2F-Cyclin A complex. Cell 68, 167-176 -   53. Dynlacht, B. D. (1997) Regulation of transcription by proteins     that control the cell cycle. Nature 389, 149-152 -   54. Dynlacht, B. D., Brook, A., Dembski, M., Yenush, L. and     Dyson, N. (1994) DNA-binding and trans-activation properties of     drosophila E2F and DP proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91,     6359-6363 -   55. Dynlacht, B. D., Moberg, K., Lees, J. A., Harlow, E. and     Zhu, L. (1997) Specific regulation of E2F family members by     cyclin-dependent kinases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3867-3875 -   56. Ewen, M. E., Faha, B., Harlow, E. and Livingston, D. M. (1992)     Interaction of p107 with cyclin A independent of complex formation     with viral oncoproteins. Science 255, 85-87 -   57. Faha, B., Ewen, M., Tsai, L., Livingston, D. M. and     Harlow, E. (1992) Interaction between human cyclin A and adenovirus     E1A-associated p107 Protein. Science 255, 87-90 -   58. Felzen, L. K., Farrell, S., Betts, J. C., Mosavin, R. and     Nabel, G. J. (1999) Specificity of cyclin-cdk2, TFIIB, and E1A     interactions with a common domain of the p300 coactivator. Mol.     Cell. Biol. 19, 4241-4246 -   59. Fu, T. J., Peng, J., Lee, G., Price, D. H. and Flores, O. (1999)     Cyclin K functions as a CDK9 regulatory subunit and participates in     RNA polymerase II transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 34527-34530 -   60. Gebara, M. M., Sayre, M. H. and Corden, J. L. (1997)     Phosphorylation of the carboxy-terminal repeat domain in RNA     polymerase II by cyclin-dependent kinases is sufficient to inhibit     transcription. J. Cell. Biochem. 64, 390-402 -   61. Gossen, M. and Bujard, H. (1992) Tight control of gene     expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters.     Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5547-5551 -   62. Hannon, G. J., Demetrick, D. and Beach, D. (1993) Isolation of     the Rb-related p130 through its interactions with CDK2 and cyclins.     Genes Dev. 7, 2378-2391 -   63. Hengartner, C. J., Myer, V. E., Liao, S. M., J., W. C.,     Koh, S. S. and Young, R. A. (1998) Temporal regulation of RNA     polymerase II by Srb10 and Kin28 cyclin-dependent kinases. Mol. Cell     2, 43-53 -   64. Jackson, P. K., Chevalier, S., Philippe, M. and     Kirschner, M. W. (1995) Early events in DNA replication require     cyclin E and are blocked by p21CIP1. J. Cell. Biol. 130, 755-69 -   65. Jeffrey, P., Gorina, S. and Pavletich, N. (1995) Crystal     structure of the tetramerization domain of the p53 tumor suppressor     at 1.7 angstroms. Science 267, 1498-1502 -   66. Jones, K. A. (1997) Taking a new TAK on Tat transactivation.     Genes Dev. 11, 2593-2599 -   67. Kaelin, W. G., Pallas, D. C., DeCaprio, J. A., Kaye, F. J. and     Livingston, D. M. (1991) Identification of cellular proteins that     can interact specifically with the T/E1A-binding region of the     retinoblastoma gene product. Cell 64, 521-532 -   68. Kimmelman, J., Kaldis, P., Hengartner, C. J., Laff, G. M.,     Koh, S. S., Young, R. A. and Solomon, M. J. (1999) Activating     phosphorylation of the Kin28p subunit of yeast TFIIH by Cak1p. Mol.     Cell. Biol. 19, 4774-4787 -   69. Krek, W., Ewen, M., Shirodkar, S., Arany, Z., Kaelin, W. G. and     Livingston, D. M. (1994) Negative regulation of the growth-promoting     transcription Factor E2F-1 by a stably bound cyclin A-dependent     protein kinase. Cell 78, 1-20 -   70. Lania, L., Majello, B. and Napolitano, G. (1999) Transcriptional     control by cell-cycle regulators: a review. J. Cell. Physiol. 179,     134-141 -   71. Lee, M. H., Williams, B. O., Mulligan, G., Mukai, S.,     Bronson, R. T., Dyson, N., Harlow, E. and Jacks, T. (1996) Targeted     disruption of p107: functional overlap between p107 and Rb. Genes     Dev. 10, 1621-1632 -   72. Lees, E., Faha, B., Dulic, V., Reed, S. I. and Harlow, E. (1992)     Cyclin E/cdk2 and cyclin A/cdk2 kinases associate with p107 and E2F     in a temporally distinct manner. Genes Dev. 6, 1874-1885 -   73. Leresche, A., Wolf, V. J. and Gottesfeld, J. M. (1996)     Repression of RNA polymerase II and III transcription during M phase     of the cell cycle. Exp Cell Res. 229, 282-288 -   74. Ma, T., Van Tine, B. A., Wei, Y, Garrett, M. D., Nelson, D.,     Adams, P. D., Wang, J., Qin, J., Chow, L. T., Harper, J. W. (2000)     Cell cycle-regulated phosphorylation of p220NPAT by cyclin E/Cdk2 in     Cajal bodies promotes histone gene transcription. Genes Dev., 14,     2298-2313 -   75. Majello, B., Napolitano, G., Giordano, A. and Lania, L. (1999)     Transcriptional regulation by targeted recruitment of     cyclin-dependent CDK9 kinase in vivo. Oncogene, 18, 4598-4605 -   76. Mudryj, M., Devoto, S. H., Hiebert, S. W., Hunter, T., Pines, J.     and Nevins, J. R. (1991) Cell cycle regulation of the E2F     transcription factor involves an interactin with cyclin A. Cell 65,     1243-1253 -   77. Neuman, E., Ladha, M. H., Lin, N., Upton, T. M., Miller, S. J.,     DiRenzo, J., Pestell, R. G., Hinds, P. W., Dowdy, S. F., Brown, M.,     Ewen, M. E. (1997) Cyclin D1 stimulation of estrogen receptor     transcriptional activity independent of cdk4. Mol Cell Biol 17,     5338-47 -   78. Noble, M. E., Endicott, J. A., Brown, N. R. and     Johnson, L. N. (1997) The cyclin box fold: protein recognition in     cell-cycle and transcription control. Trends Biochem Sci. 22,     482-487 -   79. Peeper, D. S., Parker, L. L., Ewen, M. E., Toebes, M.,     Frederick, F. L., Xu, M., Zantema, A., van der Eb, A. J. and     Pinwica-Worms, H. (1993) A- and B-type cyclins differentially     modulate substrate specificity of cyclin-CDK complexes. EMBO J. 12,     1947-1954 -   80. Perkins, N. D., Felzen, L. K., Betts, J. C., Leung, K.,     Beach, D. H. and Nabel, G. J. (1997) Regulation of NF-kappaB by     cyclin-dependent Kinases associated with the p300 Coactivator.     Science 275, 523-527 -   81. Qin, X.-Q., Livingston, D. M., Ewen, M., Sellers, W. R., Arany,     Z., and Kaelin, W. G. (1995) The transcription factor E2F1 is a     downstream target of RB action. Mol. Biol. Cell. 15, 742-755 -   82. Rickert, P., Corden, J. L. and Lees, E. (1999) Cyclin C/CDK8 and     cyclin H/CDK7/p36 are biochemically distinct CTD kinases. Oncogene     18, 1093-1102 -   83. Roberts, J. M. (1999) Evolving ideas about cyclins. Cell 98,     129-132 -   84. Schulman, B., Lindstrom, D. and Harlow, E.: (1998) Substrate     recruitment to cyclin-dependent kinase 2 by a multipurpose docking     site on cyclin A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 10453-10458 -   85. Schwarz, J. K., Devoto, S. H., Smith, E. J., Chellappan, S. P.,     Jakoi, L. and Nevins, J. R. (1993) Interactions of the p107 and Rb     proteins with E2F during the cell proliferation response. EMBO J.     12, 1013-1020 -   86. Sellers, W. R., Neuman, E. and Kaelin, W. G. (1995) The     Retinoblastoma protein contains a potent transrepression domain     which Induces a cell-cycle block when bound to DNA. Proc. Natl.     Acad. Sci. USA 92, 11544-11548 -   87. Shanahan, F., Seghezzi, W., Parry, D., Mahony, D. and     Lees, E. (1999) Cyclin E associates with BAF155 and BRG1, components     of the mammalian SWI-SNF complex, and alters the ability of BRG1 to     induce growth arrest. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1460-1469 -   88. Sherr, C. J. (1996) Cancer Cell Cycles. Science, 274, 1672-1677 -   89. Smith, E. J., Leone, G. and Nevins, J. R. (1998) Distinct     mechanisms control the accumulation of the Rb-related p107 and p130     proteins during cell growth. Cell Growth Differ. 9, 297-303 -   90. Starostik, P., Chow, K. N. and Dean, D. C. (1996)     Transcriptional repression and growth suppression by the p107 pocket     protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3606-3614 -   91. Tedder, T. F. and Isaacs, C. M. (1989) Isolation of cDNAs     Encoding the CD19 Antigen of Human and Mouse B Lymphocytes. J.     Immunology 143, 712-717 -   92. van den Heuvel, S. and Harlow, E. (1993) Distinct roles for     cyclin-dependent kinases in cell cycle control. Science 262,     2050-2053 -   93. Weinberg, R. A. (1995) The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle     control. Cell 81, 323-330 -   94. Xu, M., Sheppard, K. A., Peng, C-Y., Yee, A. S., and     Piwnica-Worms, H. (1994) Cyclin A/cdk2 binds directly to E2F1 and     inhibits the DNA-binding activity of E2F1/DP1 by phosphorylation.     Mol Cell. Biol. 14, 8420-8431 -   95. Yankulov, K. Y. and Bentley, D. L. (1997) Regulation of CDK7     substrate specificity by MAT1 and TFIIH. EMBO J. 16, 1638-1646 -   96. Zamanian, M. and La Thangue, N. B. (1993) Transcriptional     repression by the RB-related protein p107. Mol. Biol. Cell 4,     389-396 -   97. Zhao, J., Dynlacht, B., Imai, T., Hori, T. and Harlow, E. (1998)     Expression of NPAT, a novel substrate of cyclin E-CDK2, promotes     S-phase entry. Genes Dev. 12, 456-461 -   98. Zhao, J., Kennedy, B. K., Lawrence, B. D., Barbie, D. A.,     Matera, A. G., Fletcher, J. A. and Harlow, E. (2000) NPAT links     cyclin E-Cdk2 to the regulation of replication-dependent histone     gene transcription. Genes and Dev. 14, 2283-2297 -   99. Zhu, L., Enders, G., Lees, J. A., Beijersbergen, R. L.,     Bernards, R. and Harlow, E. (1995a) The pRB-related protein p107     contains two growth suppression domains: Independent interactions     with E2F and cyclin/cdk complexes. EMBO J. 14, 1904-1913 -   100. Zhu, L., Harlow, E. and Dynlacht, B. D. (1995b) p107 uses a     p21/CIP1-related domain to bind cyclin/cdk2 and regulate     interactions with E2F. Genes Dev. 9, 1740-1752 -   101. Zhu, Y., Pe'ery, T., Peng, J., Ramanathan, Y., Marshall, N.,     Marshall, T., Amendt, B., Mathews, M. B. and Price, D. H. (1997)     Transcription elongation factor P-TEFb is required for HIV-1 tat     transactivation in vitro. Genes Dev. 11, 2622-2632 -   102. Zwijsen, R. M., Wientjens, E., Klompmaker, R., van der Sman,     J., Bernards, R., Michalides, R. J. (1997) CDK-independent     activation of estrogen receptor by cyclin D1. Cell 88, 405-15 -   103. Zwijsen, R. M., Buckle, R. S., Hijmans, E. M., Loomans, C. J.,     Bernards, R. (1998) Ligand-independent recruitment of steroid     receptor coactivators to estrogen receptor by cyclin D1. Genes Dev.     12, 3488-98

EQUIVALENTS

Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, numerous equivalents to the specific procedures described herein. Such equivalents are considered to be within the scope of the present invention and are covered by the following claims. The contents of all references, issued patents, and published patent applications cited throughout this application are hereby incorporated by reference. The appropriate components, processes, and methods of those patents, applications and other documents may be selected for the present invention and embodiments thereof. 

1. A light-generating fusion protein comprising a ligand binding site and a light-generating polypeptide moiety, wherein said ligand binding site is a mammalian HIF1α polypeptide moiety comprising the amino acid sequence corresponding to the N-terminal residues 1-600 of HIF1α, wherein a) residue 402 is hydroxylated proline, b) residue 564 is hydroxylated proline, or c) both residue 402 and residue 564 are hydroxylated proline; and wherein said light-generating polypeptide moiety is luciferase, and wherein said ligand is pVHL, whereupon ligand binding to said ligand binding site alters the luminescence of said light-generating polypeptide moiety.
 2. The light-generating fusion protein of claim 1, further comprising a targeting moiety.
 3. A light-generating fusion protein comprising a ligand binding site and a light-generating polypeptide moiety, wherein said ligand binding site is a mammalian HIF1α polypeptide moiety, wherein said light-generating polypeptide moiety is luciferase, and wherein said ligand is pVHL, wherein said ligand binding site comprises the amino acid sequence Y-X₁-Leu-X₂-Pro_(h)-X₃-X₄-X₅-X₆-Y′ (SEQ ID NO: 12), wherein Pro_(h) is hydroxylated proline; X₁, X₂, X₃, X₄, X₆, and X₆ are amino acids selected so as to not modify or alter VHL binding properties, wherein X₁, X₂, X₄, X₆, and X₆ are independently Gly, Ala, Val, Leu, Ile, Pro, Met, Phe, or Trp, and wherein X₃ is Ser, Thr, or Tyr; and Y and Y′ are independently present or absent and, if present, independently comprise a peptide having from 1 to 600 amino acids; and wherein a) the amino acid at position 402 when numbered in accordance with wild type HIF1α is hydroxylated proline, b) the amino acid at position 564 when numbered in accordance with wild type HIF1α is hydroxylated proline, or c) both the amino acid at position 402 and the amino acid at position 564 when numbered in accordance with wild type HIF1α are hydroxylated proline; and whereupon ligand binding to said ligand binding site alters the luminescence of said light-generating polypeptide moiety. 